Submitted by CryptoTrader1024 t3_zwqxxb in philosophy
iiioiia t1_j215hbh wrote
Reply to comment by YuGiOhippie in An Argument in Favour of Unpredictable, Hard Determinism by CryptoTrader1024
> I’d argue this is more the result of capitalism Not science
I can agree with that, can you agree that:
-
science is a pre-requisite to make it happen?
-
the scientific community is not well known for saying (because they do not say it) that their work is producing harm because much of their work is conducted under capitalism?
YuGiOhippie t1_j215xv5 wrote
Science is not a pre-requisite to capitalism.
All work is in the capitalist system right now science included, but that’s not a fault of science.
Science is as often stifled by capitalism as it is financed
iiioiia t1_j21hxta wrote
>>> I’d argue this is more the result of capitalism Not science
>> I can agree with that, can you agree that: science is a pre-requisite to make it happen?
> Science is not a pre-requisite to capitalism.
Oh my.
> All work is in the capitalist system right now science included, but that’s not a fault of science.
Are harmful things that science contributed to the fault of science?
If capitalism can be guilty of things, why can science not be guilty of things?
> Science is as often stifled by capitalism as it is financed
Perhaps (you're welcome to show your work), but this is orthogonal to whether science causes harm.
YuGiOhippie t1_j21lkb5 wrote
Science is a method.
Capitalism is a system.
Any method used within a system is tinted by it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments