Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

iiioiia t1_j20y4o6 wrote

Reply to comment by YuGiOhippie in An Argument in Favour of Unpredictable, Hard Determinism by CryptoTrader1024

I'm saying I don't believe the output of religion could destroy the ecosystem of Planet Earth with the same efficiency that the output of science is now doing.

Do you believe that religion is capable of it, and if so could you explain how?

1

YuGiOhippie t1_j214jes wrote

I’d argue this is more the result of capitalism Not science

Capitalism is a kind of religion too

2

iiioiia t1_j215hbh wrote

> I’d argue this is more the result of capitalism Not science

I can agree with that, can you agree that:

  • science is a pre-requisite to make it happen?

  • the scientific community is not well known for saying (because they do not say it) that their work is producing harm because much of their work is conducted under capitalism?

0

YuGiOhippie t1_j215xv5 wrote

Science is not a pre-requisite to capitalism.

All work is in the capitalist system right now science included, but that’s not a fault of science.

Science is as often stifled by capitalism as it is financed

2

iiioiia t1_j21hxta wrote

>>> I’d argue this is more the result of capitalism Not science

>> I can agree with that, can you agree that: science is a pre-requisite to make it happen?

> Science is not a pre-requisite to capitalism.

Oh my.

> All work is in the capitalist system right now science included, but that’s not a fault of science.

Are harmful things that science contributed to the fault of science?

If capitalism can be guilty of things, why can science not be guilty of things?

> Science is as often stifled by capitalism as it is financed

Perhaps (you're welcome to show your work), but this is orthogonal to whether science causes harm.

1

YuGiOhippie t1_j21lkb5 wrote

Science is a method.

Capitalism is a system.

Any method used within a system is tinted by it.

2