CoolCatPD t1_j183079 wrote
Reply to comment by svoodie2 in Anarchism at the End of the World: A defence of the instinct that won’t go away by Sventipluk
I feel like you're just wanting to talk AT me at this point, but I'll respond one last time here. I don't see how questioning whether a power relationship is justified or not ISN'T a defining feature of anarchism, but yes everyone sort of does that, but anarchism is still a reaction to that question, making it an essential component. You HAVE to ask that to get there. Sure maybe Chomsky's too broad here, but I don't see how its nonsensical. Anarchists would be the reactionaries to an authority they deem unjustified, and I think it's honestly as simple as that.
svoodie2 t1_j18axik wrote
You feel that way because this is the first comment you have made that is actually engaging with the topic of discussion.
"I don't see how questioning whether a power relationship is justified or not ISN'T a defining feature of anarchism"
It is. Along with every other political theory. The real thing you have to explain is how under Chomsky's definition theocracy or fascism isn't anarchist because it questions the justification of liberal democratic authority, and seek to dismantle it because they view it as unjustified.
You are merely stating that you disagree without giving me a real reason why my extrapolation of the consequences of that definition do not follow.
Something other than what Chomsky proposes is pretty obviously what separates anarchism from other political theories.
CoolCatPD t1_j19lqeb wrote
Yeah no I think I've engaged this entire time I just haven't given you a precise definition that you're happy with. It makes sense to me, and plenty of other people. I would say that yes, any group that momentarily overthrows the current authority to be somewhat anarchic. That's just how it seems to me. You don't have to agree, that's fine. Everyone has a different definition of seeking personal liberty, even if it's on their way to oppression or fascism or democracy. Dismantling an authority is being an anarchist.
svoodie2 t1_j1ahr7n wrote
At least your engaging. Finally. I do however find myself thoroughly unconvinced by your, and Chomsky's, claim by extension that Franco was 'doing an Anarchy' so to speak when he overthrew the Spanish Republic.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments