Submitted by DirtyOldPanties t3_zl0vmo in philosophy
DirtyOldPanties OP t1_j05wowl wrote
Reply to comment by Vainti in Objective Moral Values: Basic Human Needs by DirtyOldPanties
I think the distinction is one of choice and the capacity to support oneself. If a person is capable of supporting themselves they'd have a moral responsibility to do so.
Vainti t1_j06dyp6 wrote
I don’t believe you can square the use of parasite with a concern for that entity’s agency. It’s like trying to trust a person who says, “I don’t hate Jews because of their genetics; I call them rats because of the choices they’ve made.” Even if I grant that you don’t condemn people for being unproductive through no fault of their own, this parasite rhetoric still evokes imagery of hate toward desperate victims (like drug addicts and the mentally ill). It’s not like the people you’re calling parasites are benefiting from their behavior. They need rehabilitation and community more than condemnation.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments