Submitted by Vico1730 t3_z0s4dw in philosophy
iiioiia t1_ixd5f8q wrote
Reply to comment by bumharmony in On the advantages of believing that nothing is true by Vico1730
> Actually truth requires 100% unanimity.
Let's say someone asserts that there is a ticking time bomb planted at some location, and there is a dispute between people on the matter. As long as the dispute remains, does that prevent the bomb from exploding?
bumharmony t1_ixduun8 wrote
Idk what you want to say with that. There is no bomb or if there is may be you should call the police. Im only saying that there may be a procedure for something but outcomes are no longer possible. One could possibly know how to catch butterflies but he/she could actually catch them any longer if they had become extinct.
iiioiia t1_ixdwgib wrote
I'm not saying so much as I am demonstrating how a person behaves when a point is raised that conflicts with their presentation of reality. In this case, you dodged the question - in my experience there are < 10 standard behaviors, and this is one of them.
bumharmony t1_ixe9x1p wrote
Sounds like opportunism rather than serious search for truth.
iiioiia t1_ixeajr3 wrote
Speaking of truth: it may sound like opportunism, but is it actually?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments