drCocktor420 t1_iwwtdnv wrote
Reply to comment by chiefmors in For world philosophy day 13 thinkers share the philosophical questions that will define this century | Including Noam Chomsky on destruction, Naomi Oreskes on climate crisis and Carissa Veliz on innovation by IAI_Admin
Whether or not the political is dependent on how much we understand philosophy (idealism) is itself a philosophically debatable question.
Southern_Winter t1_iwxak51 wrote
I think it's a debatable question in a descriptive sense. It's an open question whether people vote primarily in their material self-interest vs ideology etc.
But I think in a normative sense, it would be impossible to avoid questions of ethics or other "ideological" constructs. Even the most materialist analysis contains agents that act in a self-interested manner, and behind that self-interest are ethical or normative preferences that are worthy of examination on an individual basis, as opposed to strictly a collective sociological analysis.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments