Submitted by simonperry955 t3_yuv3c5 in philosophy
eliyah23rd t1_ixdgl80 wrote
Reply to comment by simonperry955 in The structure of moral normativity by simonperry955
Oh, I wasn't retracting on the value of the distinction. However, you had made me realize that the descriptive project can record the fact of one partner pressuring the other to accept a categorical and not just a hypothetical value.
I think I need to retreat to a usage that involves logic/reason. My position is that this pressure cannot succeed at a logical argument for accepting a categorical but only a hypothetical. It can try, but it must fail. However, limbic, non-lingustic pressure to accept a categorical is found everywhere.
simonperry955 OP t1_ixe8xks wrote
That's probably because the limbic system accepts thriving and surviving as an unquestioned goal. Anything that promotes these, to the limbic system, is a categorical imperative.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments