Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Until_Morning t1_ivcpu6r wrote

Reply to comment by bumharmony in Michael Shermer argues that science can determine many of our moral values. Morality is aimed at protecting certain human desires, like avoidance of harm (e.g. torture, slavery). Science helps us determine what these desires are and how to best achieve them. by Ma3Ke4Li3

I have tried to read that first sentence over and over again and it's just not working...

1

bumharmony t1_ive5sdb wrote

It just means that we are not to ponder whether there is a ready ethical code somewhere in historical texts, in nature or religious texts that wait for our discovery. Ethics are constructed as a social contract although Kant is sometimes seen as a proponent of moral realism, that there is ready moral principle for all and you just need to *understand it correctly*, which leads to circularism and fideism.

It just means that philosophy is aporematic, that is, it starts from the discovery of a conflict and attempts to resolve that conflict, not from bibliophilic motives for example. Specific fields of study, like that of theology, can be a mere hobby, but philosophy can not be a hobby I think.

1

Until_Morning t1_iveg836 wrote

Interesting. I think I can grasp this concept on a rudimentary level. I still think the first sentence was worded super weirdly though 💀

1