bigiuclau t1_ivdra4i wrote
Etichs science etc are just concepts created by us to ubderstand the world and so not objective. I belive we are not capable of a true objective perspective. Art and such is maybe closer to objectivity than science. Bear๐ป with me. When we use words we use concepts. If we say leaf ๐ฟ we are we are refering to the concept of leaf in reality there are no 2 leaves alike. The leaf ๐ฟ It's a information we obtained with all our senses than converted by our mind in thoughts than we converted it into words (into concepts). So clearly there cant be an objective information transmitted through words and reason. Instead when observing art ๐จ ๐ญ the information is transimted through your senses it doesn't suffer from so many "translations".
contractualist OP t1_ivhdg79 wrote
Thanks for the response. I would define the objective as "publicly observable" explainable and even a "shared subjective."
The fact that you are able to articulate your point and I can (try to) understand it , is what I mean by objective. Meanwhile, there are perceptions and experiences that you will have that I could never understand in the same way, no matter how much we were to communicate with one another. Thats the subjective.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments