Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

zhibr t1_iuhe400 wrote

Reply to comment by contractualist in Freedom vs. Utility (the modern Euthyphro dilemma) by contractualist

So what makes one social contract better than another? A bunch of slave-keeping Southerners have a social contract where their freedom is important, but the slaves' freedom isn't. And if you say a contract that includes more people who have freedom is better, then does that directly make factory farming wrong, because the billions of cows, pigs, etc. should have freedom too? Or is there a reason to exclude animals?

1

contractualist OP t1_iuk5se5 wrote

All free humans would be included in the social contract, and would never agree to the slave owners terms, making their laws unjust. The actual social contract would exclude slavery.

Whether animals are included in our moral universe depends on whether they have a conscious (free) experience.

1