Submitted by TuvixWasMurderedR1P t3_yd1jb3 in philosophy
NobleOceanAlleyCat t1_itr54u7 wrote
Reply to comment by Vytral in Peter Singer Is the Philosopher of the Status Quo by TuvixWasMurderedR1P
My guess is that Singer knows he’d alienate these billionaires if he came off as too socialist. Given his pessimism about systemic political change, he probably sees the choice as between:
(A) Billionaires donate large sums of money to aid organizations to help worst off + No systemic political change
Vs
(B) Billionaires don’t donate their money + No systemic political change.
Perhaps his pessimism is unwarranted and he should reject both (A) and (B) as the only options. But until he’s convinced of another option, (A) is obviously the better choice, and it’s the choice that Singer is making, by not being too critical of billionaires.
ddrcrono t1_ittxzbm wrote
Given this he could also choose a more neutral or mildly critical approach. That would also be a better focus for an article critiquing him here.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments