Bodywithoutorgans18 t1_itfi3n6 wrote on October 23, 2022 at 7:04 AM

Reply to comment by ConsciousLiterature in [Peter Harrison] Why religion is not going away and science will not destroy it by BasketCase0024

>I think you know less about psychology than you know about physics.

Why is this the question that makes you defensive? Do you not think you have exhibited a very clear pattern of narcissistic traits in this conversation?

>Nonsense.

No.

>What is that?

That people are narcissistic.

ConsciousLiterature t1_itfjtnd wrote on October 23, 2022 at 7:28 AM

>Why is this the question that makes you defensive?

What makes you think I am defensive?

>Do you not think you have exhibited a very clear pattern of narcissistic traits in this conversation?

Not at all.

>That people are narcissistic.

You certainly seem to be. Maybe it's a trait common in religious people. After all if you think there is some omniscient omnipresent being that created the universe and you think this being actually cares about you, what you eat, who you have sex with and why, where you touch yourself on your own body etc that's pretty narcissistic.

Bodywithoutorgans18 t1_itfki7x wrote on October 23, 2022 at 7:37 AM

>What makes you think I am defensive?

It's the only one you gave more than a one word answer to, and you answered with an insult.

What would you classify as narcissistic traits?

>and you think this being actually cares about you, what you eat, who you have sex with and why, where you touch yourself on your own body etc that's pretty narcissistic.

I don't think that at all.

>You certainly seem to be.

But not you? I can assure you I do not meet the clinical definition or anything close to it. I have a plethora of Psychologists who have said so. I got sued and paid for a couple of lawyers' and multiple psychologists vacations and kids' college funds. I do not question at all where I clinically lie on any of those scales. I wasn't always such a nice person.

ConsciousLiterature t1_itfm5tu wrote on October 23, 2022 at 8:00 AM

>It's the only one you gave more than a one word answer to, and you answered with an insult.

I think I actually over estimated your analytical skills.

>I don't think that at all.

Do you eat pork? What does the Quran have to say about that?

>But not you?

no not me.

> I can assure you I do not meet the clinical definition or anything close to it.

How can I trust your assurances? You have demonstrated a severe lack of knowledge about anything scientific and what's worse a highly illogical mind.

>I have a plethora of Psychologists who have said so.

Do you now.

>I got sued and paid for a couple of lawyers' and multiple psychologists vacations and kids' college funds.

Uh huh. Sure you did.

>I wasn't always such a nice person.

you are not a nice person now.

Bodywithoutorgans18 t1_itfmh30 wrote on October 23, 2022 at 8:04 AM

>I think I actually over estimated your analytical skills.

What would you classify as narcissistic tendencies?

>How can I trust your assurances?

I have no reason to lie to some dipshit on the internet who I am only interested in communicating with at a base level for my own scientific purposes.

>You have demonstrated a severe lack of knowledge about anything scientific and what's worse a highly illogical mind.

But I make more than you do. So, what's that tell you about society, or really the worth of your overall opinion on the subject?

>Uh huh. Sure you did.

See the two statements above.

>you are not a nice person now.

See the three statements above.