Leemour t1_irjpa50 wrote
Reply to comment by DeliciousCanary4711 in “Scientific progress is thwarted by the ownership of knowledge.” How Karl Popper’s philosophy of science can overcome clinical corruption. by IAI_Admin
Alright tinfoil hatter. Totally wasnt trying to tell you that you need to read carefully what researchers publish, that peer review is not the same thing as doing a meta study and all of this is separate from what the process of the medical community and drug administration selecting their treatment methods and drugs.
The meta study is major in the sense that it debunks seratonin theory altogether, but there were many psychologists and therapists who already knew that. Even the article points out that this myth was/is chiefly believed by the general public. Regardless of this, the drugs go through a drug trial, which is different from all of this; they worked for a certain amount of people, so it passed the test, maybe not for the reasons we understand, but if it works, then it works and despite this study its not wise to force these drugs off the shelf when they work in drug trials.
You, not understanding the nuance of these things only proves your ignorance. The hysteria is just cherry on top.
DeliciousCanary4711 t1_irk7oby wrote
> tinfoil
Solid argument. No you!
Leemour t1_irk9dtt wrote
2 words is all you could read... well done
DeliciousCanary4711 t1_irkfy4s wrote
You didn't present any arguments to respond to, just name calling.
Leemour t1_irkg9vh wrote
3rd time you've shown you don't actually read my posts, thanks for the waste of time.
DeliciousCanary4711 t1_irkpwim wrote
Try writing something interesting.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments