Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Bensemus t1_irges1j wrote

Except the funding that makes it possible... Is this a challenging concept for you?

In the US the public is rarely in favour of spending tax dollars on science. People are constantly calling for NASA's budget to be reduced as they see no purpose in the science they do. Now try and replace all the private dollars with government ones and see how that's received.

0

Vast-Material4857 t1_irgijjf wrote

But it's not inherent to science. That's a clerical issue. You can conduct science publicly just as well as you can privately, nothing necessitates private organizations to being essential to creation of new science.

>In the US the public is rarely in favour of spending tax dollars on science.

Do you think we produce more science through private institutions than public ones?

0

VitriolicViolet t1_irgo8dc wrote

>You can conduct science publicly just as well as you can privately, nothing necessitates private organizations to being essential to creation of new science.

decades of brainwashing have convinced most people gov shouldnt run hospitals, prisons or schools ffs. these idiots think gov doing things is communism and automatically worse then private leechs doing the same thing +cost.

2