Submitted by JackDMcLovin t3_xtbbi0 in philosophy
[removed]
Submitted by JackDMcLovin t3_xtbbi0 in philosophy
[removed]
Is this the philosophy sub or complain about people from other sub sub?
Yeah, I’m a bit confused.
EDIT: Right side, judging purely based on comment history.
Complain about other people sub according to this poster 💀
The ones in the comments, and the "love is love". Pedophilia is love, does that make it okay?
Gotcha. I was kinda confused about what the OP was getting at
It's philosophy, back in the day people used to post my comments here and point out what was wrong with it. Same thing applies here.
I would not say pedophilia is love. Pedophilia is being sexually attracted to someone you most definitely should not be attracted to (minors).
Philia means love
How, it's bad reasoning, if you can't tell how it's bad then you can't do adequate Philosophy.
Quote all the etymology you want. There's nothing about pedophilia that implicates real love. And the fact that you're trying to say it is (or at least say it is for the sake of your argument) is horrendous.
Hey! Thanks for reaching out in reply back to me, I actually have no interest in having a conversation with you. Take care!
It also follows the same pattern as abuse and domestic violence, due to the damage done to one of the parties in order to bring pleasure to the other.
Words can have several meanings, in this case attraction rather than love. An example would be hydrophilic molecules.
Then you don't know what love is.
Exactly, so is LGBT out of attraction, or out of a Christlike love? Are you doing it because you like it, or because that is what is right to do? And by right i mean your duty as a replicator.
Not all love is equal. Is the love for your country the same as your SO? Is your love for pizza the same as your parents? In both cases the answer is no, hence "love is love" is a falce equivalency.
In the case of pedophilia it follows the pattern of abuse/abusive relationships rather than equitable and mutually beneficial ones. So you could say it is the same as the love for abusing and torturing.
"Look at how bad other people are at reasoning!"
Goes on to base the entire content of an argument on an etymological fallacy.
Alright.
The etymological claim does not even add up, by the way, the modern concept of love is derived from a developed conception that mostly comes to us through Latin amor (equivalent to Greek érōs, not philía) which has been expanded and given new meaning over time. There is no direct translation so that "love" in the etymological origin of the word "pedophilia" has the same sense as "love" in the sentence "love is love".
LGB (T is a separate thing) from a biological standpoint are variations of the reproductive instinct. The instinct itself evolutionarily came about a very long time ago and can be seen in pretty much all multicellular life.
Humans have evolved further as there is a need for a large parental investment for the offspring to survive, and have a mechanism that creates a neurological response based on the emotions of others that includes more complex interactions. For example feeling good after we have helped someone we care about (oxytocin and vasopressin associated dopamine response).
Therefore, for while not reproductively beneficial, LGB follows (or at least can follow) the rest of the patten of a healthy relationship. Circling back to the original topic, a mutually exclusive thing with pedophilia. Its a bit more complex than that, but that's the gist.
Your post was removed for violating the following rule:
>The following (not exhaustive) list of items require moderator pre-approval: meta-posts, posts to products, services or surveys, links to other areas of reddit, AMAs. Please contact the moderators for pre-approval via modmail.
>The following (not exhaustive) list of items require moderator pre-approval: meta-posts, posts to products, services or surveys, links to other areas of reddit, AMAs. Please contact the moderators for pre-approval.
Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.
This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.
[deleted] t1_iqpetkx wrote
Which side are you referring to?