Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

dolphin37 t1_jdtok3x wrote

Reply to comment by DDWingert in Examining what makes a life worth living according to the ancient philosophers by ADefiniteDescription

Hmm well you said it means something to you and your opinion is all that matters, which isn’t a disagreement to self-examination. It’s actually in the path to agreement. Disregarding that, you’re now saying you have no view on interaction with other lives. So to you murdering somebody would be the same as helping somebody? If I assume the answer is that there is a difference, you are assigning a value to other lives and it’s a natural step to say that taking a life would be a bad use of life. It’s then a natural step to discourage that bad use of life, as it has a negative affect on life overall

Like I said it’s fine to take different views such as value not being dependent on self examination. But I don’t think it adds up to say we just live in an option-less silo. It seems to quite evidently not be the case

0

EasternArm2352 t1_jdu9fb7 wrote

You can murder to help someone. Assault victims for example. They aren't mutually exclusive

2

MrCW64 t1_jduqr1j wrote

> you’re now saying you have no view on interaction with other lives. So to you murdering somebody would be the same as helping somebody?

No. You are taking it out of context. You omitted the word "how"

The point that was being made is that there is no preconceived idea. Not that nothing matters.

1

dolphin37 t1_jdus2dv wrote

Can you explain why you think that makes any difference?

1