Submitted by CartesianClosedCat t3_11ygz5f in philosophy
XiphosAletheria t1_jdjbz03 wrote
Reply to comment by VioletKate99 in The Fallacy Fork: Why It’s Time to Get Rid of Fallacy Theory by CartesianClosedCat
>Just pointing out a fallacy is not enough, you also have to be able to show how that fallacy discredits the argument as it is used.
By definition the fallacy discredits the argument it was a part of. It does not, however, disprove the conclusion. If you say "the sky is blue because Joe Biden says so", I can point out that this is an argument from authority, and doing so immediately discredits your argument. The sky remains blue, however.
VioletKate99 t1_jdjo2br wrote
That is true, but the point of the post is that people don't make these kinds of arguments in real life. If I say "yesterday the bottom of the sky was red, and I know because my brother told me and I don't think he would lie to me". This sentence reflects real life more because you example is based on the absurdity of someone arguing a known universal truth, that creates the exact kind of toy sentence example that can then be easily discredited.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments