Submitted by ADefiniteDescription t3_11k6uwa in philosophy
Normal-Flower4437 t1_jb6htq9 wrote
Reply to comment by goatAlmighty in Explaining what's wrong with digital blackface by ADefiniteDescription
I forgot to add “if we determine you look like or are associated with the least marginalized, you are the least marginalized. And Vice versa.”
Which is how my brown Morrocan Jewish friend became “white” in the eyes of his progressive coworkers for being Jewish. And how immigrant children of genocides got “white privilege.” And how a blonde-haired Palestinian became “brown”, but a Christian Arab from Syria became “white”.
It’s so fucking stupid. I even witnessed a movement to categorize black men as “white-adjacent” because so many black men were getting tired of the arbitrary rules and how often they’d get points for blackness but negative points for maleness. So a bunch of super-progressive WOC on TikTok, tired of men of their own race pushing back on the ideology, started on “men of color are white-adjacent due to their maleness.”
goatAlmighty t1_jb6o8w4 wrote
That's wild.
The method they choose doesn't really matter though. As soon as somebodies' rights or their position in society are based on what race they are, that's racist by definition.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments