Submitted by Otarih t3_11b25kv in philosophy
Judgethunder t1_j9yrz2c wrote
Reply to comment by Drawmeomg in The Job Market Apocalypse: We Must Democratize AI Now! by Otarih
The difference between previous automations in textiles and transportation is that those actually created more jobs than they replaced.
What we are taking about here is potentially eliminating ALL jobs besides owning capital.
ReptileCultist t1_j9z6t8m wrote
The question is why this time automation should be different than before
Judgethunder t1_j9zbi6p wrote
Because an artificial intelligence is not the same thing as a railroad or a textile machine.
The assumption that you should be questioning is why it should be the same.
Feynnehrun t1_j9zfdhl wrote
Because, when a single industry automates a process, there are other places those workers can go after retraining. It certainly sucks for them but society is minimally impacted. When labor becomes a thing of the past, we still need to trade for and acquire goods. It would make zero sense to have a fully autonomous society that produces everything we need, but nobody is able to acquire those things because there are no jobs. Likely this would translate into a universal income.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments