Purely_Theoretical t1_j9hx34u wrote
Reply to comment by contractualist in What Morality is Not (and why it's not the Repugnant Conclusion, Utilitarianism, or Libertarianism) by contractualist
The entire point of that paper is to give a libertarian justification for having concern for future generations. Namely it extends the lockean proviso to them. I summarized the paper in my first comment.
Therefore, libertarianism does not fail to account for future generations. This is your false claim and I have refuted it.
contractualist OP t1_j9hyfdl wrote
(Up to the lockean proviso, which I state in the post. This is too minimal to be substantive).
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments