Submitted by BernardJOrtcutt t3_1177dsz in philosophy
Maximus_En_Minimus t1_ja4y8sp wrote
Reply to comment by Alexander556 in /r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | February 20, 2023 by BernardJOrtcutt
If I was to take a consequentialist point of view, but also use common sense, such a devise would likely lead to a capitalistic fascism of the likes of an Ultra-China. Who needs cameras? - just put a mind-reader 2000 on every block and monitor your populations every thought.
It is ironic, on the above post I take a pure-empathy devise would positively transform the world - which I agree with. However, as soon as you remove both consent and reduce the thought / experience to just information, not shared sensation of understanding, it quickly devolves for malicious usage.
Alexander556 t1_ja9jvjk wrote
I personally think that, if something like this would exist, we should only use it to prevent harm. If someone has planted a bomb somewhere, i have no problems with violating his privacy and reading his mind.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments