Submitted by BernardJOrtcutt t3_1177dsz in philosophy
Live-Market7576 t1_j9hoytn wrote
Reply to comment by MikeGelato in /r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | February 20, 2023 by BernardJOrtcutt
> You don't have to be vulnerable. It's safe and easy. You're satisfying a need, which neglects the growth of offline social interaction. Which is why so many
The logic of being energized by being around people and then needing to be alone to recharge is flawed.
I do agree that most people are not simply defined as one or the other. For example I get energized hanging out with my friends in person for a certain amount of time but after a while it becomes a strain. I need a break after hanging out with them before doing it again.
Social media is not actually replacing interaction between people. It is a separate entity (algorithm) to interact with that partially fills the role of other people. Instagram is where people make up their dream lives and pretend it is reality. Facebook used to show your friends activities but it is not just algorithm feeding you whatever you want just like tik tok. Snapchat is the only one that has interaction between people.
I think it is a major societal problem that people aren't forced to be socially uncomfortable for brief periods. I believe that is what solidifies people as who they are and creates confidence.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments