Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Hip-Harpist t1_j8xjldd wrote

I agree with most of this, with the exception that, to an extreme, rational thinking to explain emotions can transform into immature coping mechanisms. Rationalization will “explain away” certain emotions or reactions, like when someone with extreme fear or anxiety of lightning to believe this is natural, since lightning can instantly kill you.

Likewise, “intellectualizing” is an immature mechanism where one tries to “objectively” research or study a problem, thereby depersonalizing the person from the subject. An example would be a man with pancreatic cancer avoiding his feelings on the matter by reading clinical trials, drug trials, and survival rates for his disease at the level of a doctoral candidate instead of attending to his emotional state.

But these are extremes that you certainly didn’t imply, just worth noting, and I agree that practice is needed to find a happy medium of permitting emotional recognition and using rational thinking to guide towards a good solution.

3

jack1509 t1_j8xmtem wrote

Yeah, very good point. Rational thinking while being in a hyper emotional state is extremely tough. I think the trick is not to rationalize every thought and emotions but rather to reach an overall state of "acceptance" that emotions can be "irrational". This is more of a practice in meditation or in stoicism that slowly gives us an ability to make rational choices while acknowledging that what we are feeling right now transcends logic and reason and the futility of having a discussion with it or indulging in it in an investigative sort of way. For example: a stoic asks himself if the anger that he is feeling adds any value to the situation at hand. He reminds himself that this rush of emotions impairs his ability to makes rational choices and it is stupid to let it control you so much. Just this reminder to yourself every time you feel anger weakens it over time.

5