Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

InTheEndEntropyWins t1_j7vg071 wrote

Reply to comment by the-willow-witch in Judith Butler: their philosophy of gender explained by Necessary_Tadpole692

>Butler is saying that there’s no point in making a distinction between the two because ultimately, gender only exists because of sex.

That's where I'm confused, isn't the quote from the article is the other way round. In that sex comes from the the "social meanings"/gender?

Also isn't that the right's position, in that gender comes from sex or that they are highly linked.

3

the-willow-witch t1_j7vj8us wrote

I mean, they are linked. I think the right’s position is that they’re the same. That there are two sexes so there are two genders.

5

the-willow-witch t1_j7vk8wf wrote

“ For Butler, it makes no sense to talk about biological “sex” existing outside of its social meanings. If there is such a thing, we can’t encounter it, because we are born into a world that already has a particular understanding of gender, and that world then retrospectively tells us the meaning of our anatomy.”

We literally can not exist outside of gender and sex because of the way society forces it on us. From a young age we are dressed and treated a certain way based on our genitals. To say that sex and gender aren’t linked is to ignore this fact. They’re not saying sex and gender are the same thing but that they belong in the same conversation. Because our sex affects our gender whether they’re the same or not. Because our experiences form our perspectives in our society.

It’s like how race is made up and a social construct, but that doesn’t mean that race doesn’t affect our lives and perspectives.

I hope I’m making sense.

1

InTheEndEntropyWins t1_j7vlq49 wrote

>We literally can not exist outside of gender and sex because of the way society forces it on us.

Let's say aliens that are asexual came to earth and studies humans or other manuals.

Do you think these aliens would come up with similar/same ideas as sex as us?

I think they would, which would suggest it's something more innate to the biology rather than something society has told us.

4

the-willow-witch t1_j7voqbi wrote

I don’t understand. What does asexuality have to do with gender? That’s a sexuality.

I think they’d observe the same ideas we have about sex in regard to humans, yes, but they wouldn’t adopt the ideals because they’re not human.

Overall I’m really confused about your comment

−2

Kiltmanenator t1_j7xmqkd wrote

I think they mean asexual reproduction. For the hypothetical to make sense, the person you responded to is trying to imagine an utterly alien observer whose judgement of human sexuality would not be influenced by their own alien sexual biology.

4

InspectorG-007 t1_j7z0fr8 wrote

So, basically, it's an expression of the Persona? The individual forms a Persona that may blend/contrast with the local group Persona?

1

Doobledorf t1_j7zmijs wrote

Coming in here late, but here's what they're saying:

Ideas of gender arose from sex differences in the past. There COULD be a natural difference in how those sexes act, but because we live in a world that is already constantly defining and redefining gender roles from a cultural perspective, you are very unlikely to find it. It's like talking about "true human nature". You will never find what that means outside of the context of the world today because every human alive is influenced by countless generations of culture that have shaped how they see the very idea of "human being".

They aren't saying sex plays absolutely no part in how one feels they should express their gender, they are saying it is a pointless question that can't be answered at the end of the day.

1