Submitted by BernardJOrtcutt t3_10v7bci in philosophy
Prestigious_Sea7879 t1_j7gddit wrote
Reply to comment by Joe_Fart in /r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | February 06, 2023 by BernardJOrtcutt
My definition of "word" also includes paintings, music, etc. To the degree that they exist, any external object or perception is also words.
Joe_Fart t1_j7gg9ah wrote
I assume what are you trying to suggest is some version of Barkeley idelism. In this case, if there is no consciousness (disregarding God) the world cease to exist?
I agree that our self is indeed structured with a language, but it is more like the tool and not the thing itself. The same as our eye is recreating the outside world for us but it does not mean that only those pictures exists.
ephemerios t1_j7q3raf wrote
Right, but you haven't provided anything resembling an argument for both the definition and your overall metaphysical point.
hOprah_Winfree-carr t1_j7tpjk3 wrote
So all that exists are words because you've defined "word" to mean anything that exists. How does that help you to think about anything in a different or less confused way?
Big-Literature4233 t1_j7hp8oc wrote
Yes, I agree these ate all forms of communication, verbal of course and sign language, grail, yup Morse code.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments