Submitted by [deleted] t3_109gcrr in philadelphia
rossdowdell t1_j3yfhnq wrote
Reply to comment by FrankGrimesApartment in Was I in the wrong, and if not, did I still mess up? by [deleted]
Running is a faster form of walking. There is no Second Vatican Council canonical standard steps-per-minute scale that establishes the difference between walking, jogging and running.
It is all arbitrary to human understanding; and a futile endeavor if being pursued by a grizzly.
throwawaitnine t1_j3zmlca wrote
Pause.
There's actually a fundamental difference between walking and running. When you walk one foot is always on the ground. When you run both feet are off the ground simultaneously during each stride.
jamin_g t1_j415zda wrote
The roll of the foot is the other big one. Humans are alive today because of our ability to walk, not to run.
It takes 3 days for a human to outrun a horse.
a-german-muffin t1_j41bb9t wrote
LOL, no it doesn't. There's a crazy Welsh race where humans have managed to beat horses in just 22 miles, and ultrarunners knock off anywhere from 60 to 100 miles in a day during races. Horses are generally good for about 35 (although you can certainly train 'em to go longer).
rossdowdell t1_j3zr05t wrote
Both feet off the ground simultaneously isn't running. It's jumping.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments