Submitted by I_let_my_ramrod_rock t3_z5a7t3 in philadelphia
riri1313 t1_ixwdp4h wrote
Reply to comment by Sheldon_Cooper_1 in ULPT - Texas Thank-You Gift by I_let_my_ramrod_rock
Alright since the actual data proves you wrong, I’m going to peace out. I’m from this region in Texas btw and you don’t have any idea what you are talking about.
Sheldon_Cooper_1 t1_ixwue14 wrote
riri1313 t1_ixwulwg wrote
Your biased media site includes a comment that says “other data refuted this study”. Mind showing the original data or study?
Sheldon_Cooper_1 t1_ixwx2ue wrote
How about you show your data?
riri1313 t1_ixwx5rk wrote
I did - my comment below includes a link with further links to data. Have a look! 🤡
Sheldon_Cooper_1 t1_ixwxisj wrote
I did, the PJ article explains why that data is faulty and included congressional testimony.
If you believe any significant amount of illegal border crossers show up in court. I have a bridge to sell you.
riri1313 t1_ixwxr62 wrote
*legal border crossings. And again, I’m from the region in Texas you keep referencing - I have an understanding for the nuances of different border crossings and the rates in which those types complete their court obligations. But sure, keep trying to explain to me “how it works. ✌️
riri1313 t1_ixwurvy wrote
“In fiscal year 2018, Department of Justice (DOJ) figures show that 89 percent of all asylum applicants attended their final court hearing to receive a decision on their application. When families and unaccompanied children have access to legal representation, the rate of compliance with immigration court obligations is nearly 98 percent.“
Sheldon_Cooper_1 t1_ixwxbrl wrote
The PJ article explains why that is not true.
Are there any illegals where you live? I can assure you the ones around here aren’t going to any court.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments