Submitted by mustang__1 t3_y46wy0 in philadelphia
ScottishCalvin t1_isddodz wrote
Septa's job is to run without making a loss. Good luck with that.
Subways are insanely expensive, requiring vast public subsidy. Most of the old public transit systems were built by private companies that went bankrupt when the profits didn't match the expectations
Any new subway line is going to be build off the business case that a huge wedge of public money will a financially viable investment due to increased tax revenue from the development it will encourage. I'm sure a Roosevelt Subway would make your life easier, but development is happening anyway, so the money would be better spent elsewhere.
An example of something that *might* make sense is a trolley from Fishtown to the Stadiums. $40bn in new waterfront development, apartments and commerce, all paying taxes to a city that issued the bonds to pay for it
mustang__1 OP t1_isdod79 wrote
I dunno. While it would be a benefit to me, I think at some point 95 and the Blvd are going to run out of capacity. It'll be a godsend if they ever open the 4 lanes all the way down..... But what happens when we need a fifth lane?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments