Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

napsdufroid t1_jdmi7dx wrote

To be fair, anti-LGBT discrimination, just as anti-discrimination based on race or religion, is something anyone with more than a single brain cell would stand behind. But considering the other problems the city has, this has the appearance -- and note I said appearance -- of going for low-hanging fruit rather than addressing, say, violence, crime, or drugs.

−6

nalgene_wilder t1_jdmj4jg wrote

This only has that appearance to people who cannot comprehend the idea of caring about multiple things at the same time. Like this was a photo-op specifically centered around the LGBT community, of course they're going to speak on relevant issues

9

[deleted] t1_jdmjgzp wrote

[deleted]

−3

nalgene_wilder t1_jdmk8xk wrote

When what?

0

BigShawn424 t1_jdmu5da wrote

When are they going to speak on relevant issues.

−1

nalgene_wilder t1_jdmuklx wrote

...how does that make sense as a response to what I said? Are you really just that oblivious to the obvious context of my statement?

Hint: "relevant issues" means relevant to the event they were there for

3

BigShawn424 t1_jdmvqki wrote

What is the context of your statement. You said “of course they’re going to speak on relevant issues”. I’m saying when.

1

napsdufroid t1_jdmjiv3 wrote

Bullshit assumption, but OK

−9

nalgene_wilder t1_jdmk9zm wrote

You're a big boy, use your words

14

napsdufroid t1_jdmmzwi wrote

Be happy to when you make sense

−5

nalgene_wilder t1_jdmpyul wrote

Which part do you not understand

4