Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Pretty_Imagination62 t1_jeefkay wrote

It’s very segregated. It sounds like this survey doesn’t have a good way of capturing that point, and so it can appear neighborly when people are actually terrible.

4

Dryheavemorning t1_jeeg9if wrote

Our metro area is actually more segregated than Boston.

22

DayJob93 t1_jeehsaq wrote

Ok gotta be careful here. This article includes Wilmington and Camden in our metro area. Two very segregated cities that probably make us look worse on average. Also a metro area that dwarves the Boston metro area by population (especially minority population) so I’m not sure if any of their data is corrected for population. Your posting a 6ABC article to make a demographic data argument. I would find a better source

−5

Dryheavemorning t1_jeeikmk wrote

It's actually worse if we just look at the City. Instead of #13 we are #2 most segregated in the country between black and white only behind Chicago.. This is the Inky so hopefully they are an acceptable source to quote the Census data for you.

18

DayJob93 t1_jeejc1t wrote

They are I appreciate the additional source. After some quick googling I’ve seen Philly as “low” as 13 and as high as 2 per Inky so there’s some variability in the methods that I don’t understand. Either way, it seems like many northeast more industrial cities, Philly is highly segregated. Could be our size during the Industrial Revolution attracted many black southerners and entrenched them in certain areas due to red lining. Maybe Boston had a smaller migration of black southerners during this period seeking work in northeast cities

3

fireside68 t1_jeesklc wrote

>Our metro area is actually more segregated than Boston.

Yet, Boston is more racist. The gays in Boston are racist. The gays in Philly ain't like that.

−6