PicklePanther9000 t1_jebj7ph wrote on March 30, 2023 at 8:29 PM

This sounds like a good way to disincentivize hiring women

Narwhalbaconguy t1_jecgdrx wrote on March 31, 2023 at 12:17 AM

Just another example of being “progressive” while accomplishing the exact opposite

[deleted] t1_jecinap wrote on March 31, 2023 at 12:34 AM

[removed]

[deleted] t1_jed929a wrote on March 31, 2023 at 4:09 AM

[removed]

porkchameleon t1_jed0n96 wrote on March 31, 2023 at 2:54 AM

I don't think another anti-incentive would make a difference: while women said to produce the same results as men and reportedly get paid less at the same time, yet companies still keep hiring men.

(Yeah, I don't understand that either).

[deleted] t1_jebv38r wrote on March 30, 2023 at 9:46 PM

[deleted]

blodreina_kumWonkru t1_jec5n81 wrote on March 30, 2023 at 10:59 PM

Yes, probably. But this isn't women leave, it's specifically period leave.

I'm not sure what lengths they go to verifying you menstruate or not. That's the troublesome part.