Philodemus1984 t1_jakg947 wrote
Wingard is not merely ineffective as a leader. He has ideas about education that are scary and they would be disastrous if fully realized. The following piece is perhaps overwritten, but essentially correct in its evaluation of Wingard’s philosophy: https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/jason-wingards-edtech-griftopia/
apathetic_panda t1_jaliz9g wrote
He was hired by the trustees, though.
You can't dissociate that from how the UNI wants to be operated.
See: TUH
They asked for this specifically.
hamdynasty t1_jamdvxr wrote
This is what puzzles me- the Temple Trustees appoint all these leaders, so it stands to reason unless the Trustees are replaced, we'll keep getting the same flavor of leadership, and the same approach to labour management. "I don't approve of your choice of leader for me, don't change your appetites for leadership, just give me another leader like the one I don't approve of"
apathetic_panda t1_jamouu9 wrote
Um have you checked the city government tenures over the last century. I... Haven't looked at incumbent retention, but it appears- facile
stfuvoicesinmyhead t1_jam6aeo wrote
Thanks for posting, I did not know about Wingard's background and this is very enlightening
Fly__Eagles__Fly t1_jan4kdi wrote
Wingard saying the value of a college degree has peaked is insane to me. It’s never been more important imo. One could argue that with how quickly information flows it’s never been easier to promote a good idea to the masses. But that isn’t the typical person. The typical person would serve themselves well by furthering their education.
Level-Adventurous t1_jalyrrx wrote
Without paying Mitch attention I was thinking that temple was having a rough year, seems like one thing after another but after reading that it seems this was hired for the purpose of creating it.
[deleted] t1_janp7g9 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jaw3b6r wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments