pasnow t1_jahq9qp wrote
Reply to comment by Scumandvillany in Philly mayoral candidates are discussing gun violence tonight. Here are some key policies likely to come up by PhillyPanda
Well you could question why they were not charged and case dismissed?
​
Seems pretty clear cut. Caught. Video evidence. Gun recovered. Sitting in courtroom awaiting sentencing.
Scumandvillany t1_jahql9k wrote
Wat
pasnow t1_jahsjon wrote
Just last week wasn't one of those teens who killed an old man with a orange cone released on bail??
​
C'mon, I've now given 3 instances of you being wrong off the top of my head. Last nights heroic chase down, me having a fuckin gun to my face, and the teen out on bond.
​
DAO is inept.
CT_Real t1_jal5mx8 wrote
I don't understand what you are saying?
You are upset they were able to post bond?
LFKhael t1_jahtpbt wrote
§ 5701. Right to bail.
All prisoners shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, unless:
(1) for capital offenses or for offenses for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment; or
(2) no condition or combination of conditions other than imprisonment will reasonably assure the safety of any person and the community when the proof is evident or presumption great.
(Aug. 27, 2009, P.L.376, No.39, eff. imd.)
ragnaROCKER t1_jajqm30 wrote
plus the JUDGE sets the bail.
Ragoz t1_jai6ofd wrote
> Well you could question why they were not charged and case dismissed?
Nobody questions it because it happened 3 am this morning. What the actual fuck are you typing.
pasnow t1_jai7zdn wrote
I was referring to my further above post, which got categorized as a very 'niche' case according to the ppl on this board:
Funny, I guess I'm a 'niche' case. Look how many police resources got involved to capture the two who had me at gunpoint. (It was all on video & submitted for evidence). Krasners office let them walk after preliminary trial.
Ragoz t1_jaiajqk wrote
I'd be interested in the court case number so I can search the publicly available Philadelphia Municipal Court dockets given you know they walked. You know, to verify your claim of what happened.
pasnow t1_jaibwht wrote
lol, when you accuse someone of "lying", you already lost the argument. I have it at home. I think I went back a few weeks later & its all offline, since, it was dismissed. I may be wrong about that, I did dl a pdf of all the charges to them. (about a dozen each)
Ragoz t1_jaidp5d wrote
> lol, when you accuse someone of "lying", you already lost the argument.
Tries to hold back his snickering.
It's all right here if it exists: https://fjdclaims.phila.gov/phmuni/cms/search.do
pasnow t1_jamkjvp wrote
I'm well aware, as I said, once it was 'dismissed', it seemed to disappear off those sites a few weeks later.
Here's a link to both the video of it happening (I drive a stick, which they couldn't drive, they later jacked the uber blocks away in the nbc10 article), the docket # sheet with all the charges (page 3) and showing dismissed in Page 4. I took the suspect name off the documents out of courtesy. You can see the docket # if you wanna do your own research.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1lS9rp8HlCs_Fyolwkx6OXXS7WW7mzIA9?usp=sharing
pasnow t1_jaicdlh wrote
btw, ADA told me he's got about 100 of these ongoing at any given time. On a rotating basis.
ragnaROCKER t1_jajqhjc wrote
so it could be a resource issue instead of a DA problem?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments