Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

pasnow t1_jahmbmc wrote

11

Scumandvillany t1_jahnxe6 wrote

Sure, a broken clock is right twice a day. But the system remains largely incompetent and unable to produce arrests and cases for the vast majority of shootings and murders. Am I supposed to look at this and go thank a cop? Lol

9

pasnow t1_jahq9qp wrote

Well you could question why they were not charged and case dismissed?

​

Seems pretty clear cut. Caught. Video evidence. Gun recovered. Sitting in courtroom awaiting sentencing.

13

Scumandvillany t1_jahql9k wrote

Wat

4

pasnow t1_jahsjon wrote

Just last week wasn't one of those teens who killed an old man with a orange cone released on bail??

​

C'mon, I've now given 3 instances of you being wrong off the top of my head. Last nights heroic chase down, me having a fuckin gun to my face, and the teen out on bond.

​

DAO is inept.

13

CT_Real t1_jal5mx8 wrote

I don't understand what you are saying?

You are upset they were able to post bond?

2

LFKhael t1_jahtpbt wrote

https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/LI/consCheck.cfm?txtType=HTM&ttl=42&div=0&chpt=57&mobile_choice=suppress

§ 5701.  Right to bail.

All prisoners shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, unless:

(1)  for capital offenses or for offenses for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment; or

(2)  no condition or combination of conditions other than imprisonment will reasonably assure the safety of any person and the community when the proof is evident or presumption great.

(Aug. 27, 2009, P.L.376, No.39, eff. imd.)

0

Ragoz t1_jai6ofd wrote

> Well you could question why they were not charged and case dismissed?

Nobody questions it because it happened 3 am this morning. What the actual fuck are you typing.

2

pasnow t1_jai7zdn wrote

I was referring to my further above post, which got categorized as a very 'niche' case according to the ppl on this board:

Funny, I guess I'm a 'niche' case. Look how many police resources got involved to capture the two who had me at gunpoint. (It was all on video & submitted for evidence). Krasners office let them walk after preliminary trial.

https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/video-philly-police-chase-and-capture-carjacking-suspect/3278758/

4

Ragoz t1_jaiajqk wrote

I'd be interested in the court case number so I can search the publicly available Philadelphia Municipal Court dockets given you know they walked. You know, to verify your claim of what happened.

1

pasnow t1_jaibwht wrote

lol, when you accuse someone of "lying", you already lost the argument. I have it at home. I think I went back a few weeks later & its all offline, since, it was dismissed. I may be wrong about that, I did dl a pdf of all the charges to them. (about a dozen each)

0

Ragoz t1_jaidp5d wrote

> lol, when you accuse someone of "lying", you already lost the argument.

Tries to hold back his snickering.

It's all right here if it exists: https://fjdclaims.phila.gov/phmuni/cms/search.do

5

pasnow t1_jamkjvp wrote

I'm well aware, as I said, once it was 'dismissed', it seemed to disappear off those sites a few weeks later.

Here's a link to both the video of it happening (I drive a stick, which they couldn't drive, they later jacked the uber blocks away in the nbc10 article), the docket # sheet with all the charges (page 3) and showing dismissed in Page 4. I took the suspect name off the documents out of courtesy. You can see the docket # if you wanna do your own research.

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1lS9rp8HlCs_Fyolwkx6OXXS7WW7mzIA9?usp=sharing

1

pasnow t1_jaicdlh wrote

btw, ADA told me he's got about 100 of these ongoing at any given time. On a rotating basis.

2

ragnaROCKER t1_jajqhjc wrote

so it could be a resource issue instead of a DA problem?

0