Submitted by ColdJay64 t3_11ato41 in philadelphia
espressocycle t1_ja7ial5 wrote
Reply to comment by Fattom23 in 78-Unit, Mixed-Use Project Approved in Fishtown by ColdJay64
Why is that preferential treatment? It's just letting them keep the parking availability associated with the density of their neighborhoods before someone decided to build apartment buildings after 150 years of nothing but rowhouses. Besides, parking is always the issue that makes people fight development, so take that off the table and it will be way easier to turn rowhouse neignhoods into higher density. Again, if it's really true that apartments don't attract car owners this will be win win for everyone.
Fattom23 t1_ja7r3dj wrote
We're obviously not ever going to agree on this, but there are words for people who demand benefits from the public stock for themselves that they deny to others and they aren't very flattering.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments