Submitted by ColdJay64 t3_11ato41 in philadelphia
Fattom23 t1_ja0mfvs wrote
Reply to comment by espressocycle in 78-Unit, Mixed-Use Project Approved in Fishtown by ColdJay64
>if you keep allowing more people into the neighborhood with cars it becomes impossible to ever find a spot.
That's absolutely true, but the solution isn't to force new construction to provide parking; that gives an unfair subsidy to people who have lived in the neighborhood longer (and choose to own one or more cars). They've been able to store their stuff in the street for essentially free for decades, and everyone who lives in the neighborhood has an equal moral right to the free property storage (even if they just moved in yesterday).
Let builders build what they believe they can profit from, and manage the parking separately. Either increase the cost of a parking permit until you get the number of cars that street parking can sustain (the capitalist solution) or implement a lottery and tell people who lose that they just aren't allowed to park their car on the public street (my preferred solution, but politically untenable).
In terms of "fairness to the people who already live there", the sooner we lost this idea that their house came with guaranteed free and convenient parking the better.
espressocycle t1_ja6nw6h wrote
I didn't say force developers to build parking I said don't let the residents of new developments park on the street.
Fattom23 t1_ja7fjtg wrote
So those who already own houses get preferential treatment over everyone else? It's like US housing policy in microcosm; it has a certain elegance to its unfairness.
espressocycle t1_ja7ial5 wrote
Why is that preferential treatment? It's just letting them keep the parking availability associated with the density of their neighborhoods before someone decided to build apartment buildings after 150 years of nothing but rowhouses. Besides, parking is always the issue that makes people fight development, so take that off the table and it will be way easier to turn rowhouse neignhoods into higher density. Again, if it's really true that apartments don't attract car owners this will be win win for everyone.
Fattom23 t1_ja7r3dj wrote
We're obviously not ever going to agree on this, but there are words for people who demand benefits from the public stock for themselves that they deny to others and they aren't very flattering.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments