Mcjibblies t1_ja2r89p wrote
Reply to comment by TheTwoOneFive in Rebecca Rhynhart is running to be Philly’s 100th mayor – the first female to lead the city by Saint_2022
“Slamming”. No. I’m just wondering what she’s done to have people defending her so fervently. Help me find something to make me get on board besides the fact that she’s compiled data
TheTwoOneFive t1_ja2typd wrote
She has done more as City Controller than any person I've seen as long as I've lived in Philly - auditing both the PPA and PPD, among other things. She's not just compiling data, but also doing a detailed analysis as well and making recommendations as to how to fix issues. Plenty of recommendations on her reports, but a controller can only make recommendations, It's up to Council and the Mayor to go enforce them.
She knows where the issues are, and Philly needs someone to go and fix a lot of the bullshit that's come out from political stagnation the past decade. The mayor's office seems to be running on autopilot due to a leader who checked out a couple years ago and everyone in Council seems way too busy handing out honorariums (seriously, a large majority of what they do during their main Thursday meetings are honorariums) to actually do anything meaningful.
I don't believe she's perfect, but I haven't seen any other candidate running for mayor who I would consider as much as her. Every councilperson seems to have been twiddling their thumbs the last few years and suddenly want to save and make changes, and my biggest worry with Jeff Brown is that he will burn as much political capital trying to kill the soda tax as Kenny did trying to implement it. (And a big reason why I think so little has been done the last few years).
If you have another candidate I should be looking at, let me know. Otherwise, I'm ready to vote for Rhynhart
Mcjibblies t1_ja33f9z wrote
The soda tax issue would be an opportunity for potential policy. She said “we will look at it”.
That’s all I’m talking about, seriously. Give me one thing where she says she will do more than evaluate things.
TheTwoOneFive t1_ja33mit wrote
Mcjibblies t1_ja36lsq wrote
Thank you.
Diversionary programs, re-evaluate the cases for guns and disorderly conduct, and train/expand the police department.
Did I get that right?
TheTwoOneFive t1_ja37pgr wrote
There is a lot more in there including better reviews of injured officers, removing officers from civilian roles, working with DA to increase prosecution of illegal gun cases, community-first policing, etc.
You're clearly just trolling. Done talking with you unless you can make a case for why another candidate is better than Rhynhart.
Mcjibblies t1_ja3bq94 wrote
No critiques unless there is a better candidate is how you feel?
sugr_magnolia t1_ja3er0f wrote
Chill or you will be banned for trolling.
There are appropriate ways to encourage a discussion. You're borderline attacking other users.
Mcjibblies t1_ja5xyyt wrote
I think I’ve been pretty clear, I just want to see policy. Downvotes to drown out your perspective don’t count as an attack either I suppose. But, I want to keep my flair and I respect you guys and the sub. I’m done.
StonedAtWorkAccount t1_ja7y7si wrote
> I think I’ve been pretty clear
clearly a frickin moron
Mcjibblies t1_ja8o38i wrote
For asking questions?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments