ScottishCalvin t1_j9czi04 wrote
His battlefield performance (or lack thereof) is almost forgivable because Robert E Lee was one of history's greatest opponents. But then to go into the election with the platform of negotiating a peace, effectively surrendering at the political level, is just gross negligence. A year after that election, Lincoln (and Sherman and Grant) had overwhelmingly won the war and ended slavery in the South. The North was always miles ahead on every metric when it came to whether the war was easily winnable; McClellan was either incompetent or maybe just way over-promoted but he certainly is *far* down the list of historical locals who should get a statue
FormalManifold t1_j9d6xw0 wrote
Nah Lee was a shitty strategist and the only reason anyone thinks different is because Lost Cause propaganda worked.
In the South during the same period, he was known as "Granny Lee".
A_Peke_Named_Goat t1_j9f162u wrote
I wouldn't necessarily call Lee a shitty strategist (from a logistics standpoint, he was destined to lose so he did play a bad hand reasonably well for a while), but it's true his reputation is almost entirely built on McClellan being chicken shit. He should be remembered for being a loser and a morally repugnant human being, both in his personal life and for supporting the worst case known to mankind.
emet18 t1_j9hhrm8 wrote
Redditor try to have a nuanced take challenge Any% [IMPOSSIBLE]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments