I can't tell it and that was what I had too. But my mother worked in a big company, so it shouldn't be working "under the table" to avoid the tax from the W-2 form or W-2 whatever.

I guess maybe the W-2 tax wasn't true.

I think the problem is not you do not understand or what. I don't understand too. How can the detective closed the case because my father signed the paper for returning the check fraud amount immediately? It just doesn't make sense. My father returned the fraud after telling me I need to pay the 3000 dollar W2 Tax. Thus, if it wasn't working "under the table", then I think the W-2 tax wasn't true.

Thank you for your answering.