Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ktigger2 t1_iujojrp wrote

That $100 also took me hours of work, phone calls, digging through their medical policy to make sure they had coverage (or didn’t) plus reviewing itemized billing. I’ve totaled up my time for when I’ve done this, especially complicated cases with high dollars and I’d make more at a minimum wage job. I did seriously look at this as a business model, it’s not profitable.

500

Qbr12 t1_iujqfcq wrote

Should be $500, I flubbed my math there, but I understand what you're saying. Sometimes the juice isn't worth the squeeze.

138

falco_iii t1_iujulvj wrote

It would require streamlining and automating the process as much as possible. Have a notary ready, have a checklist of actions to take & have a lower wage assistant to do the basic steps, learn what bills normally look like so you don't chase after crumbs, etc...

23

ktigger2 t1_iujw44i wrote

LMAO at streamlining anything in regards to medical insurance in the USA. There are 4 employees that are billing related to every provider, and that’s just on the medical side. Medical insurers all have different billing systems, EOBs with info in different spots. Same with providers. You are investigating if it was billed correctly (documented correctly) and or paid correctly. Everyone answering here telling me you could make a living doing this for work has never worked with medical billing. But you are all giving me a nice laugh today.

154

fuddykrueger t1_iuk7pdy wrote

I know. I worked for a doctor who paid me a whole $20/hr (before taxes) to chase down insurance payments from his patients’ denied claims. I made him way, way more money per hour than what he paid me for my time and frustration.

40

ktigger2 t1_iuk8enr wrote

I helped work denials for a clinic as a part time gig. I found them way more $ than they paid me. I feel you! Now that I would have done for 10% of what I earned for them and still made bunk.

22

saltoftree t1_iujutrh wrote

What exactly would the notary be doing in this arrangement?

15

ktigger2 t1_iujw5f0 wrote

Nothing. It wouldn’t be necessary.

13

falco_iii t1_iujwvbo wrote

Notarizing the patient's request for full medical records, as per the article.

4

ktigger2 t1_iujxfx0 wrote

Requests for records do not need to be notarized.

17

The0nlyMadMan t1_iujymxm wrote

If a third-party is requesting your full medical history on your behalf it makes sense to me to have the request notarized

−10

ktigger2 t1_iujzuhp wrote

HIPPA doesn’t require medical record requests to be notarized.

7

The0nlyMadMan t1_iuk2lx6 wrote

I never said they did? I just said it makes sense. For sensitive information like that, I would understand it being a requirement.

−8