Submitted by bgr2258 t3_yigtqh in personalfinance
The general advice I've seen is "if you have very little medical costs, take the HSA and max it out." I also imagine that if your medical costs are high enough that you meet the deductible without trouble, then it might still be worth it. (Though I only have my own HSA offerings to judge by, which covers pretty much everything after that point)
But what if you're expecting to spend very near the deductible, and pay out of pocket? Is that maybe the worst case scenario?
I imagine it comes down to specifics, so here are some of mine:
With HSA:
Contribution limit: $3850/year
HSA premium: $-125.38/mo or ~$-1500/yr (company contributes back into HSA)
I contribute: $2350/year
HSA deductible: $6350
HSA OOP max: $6350
HSA expected medication costs: $4000 ish
HSA expected specialist visit costs: $2300 ish (hooray therapy!)
Versus a PPO:
PPO Premium: $0 (covered by company)
PPO deductible: $2000
PPO OOP max: $5000 (i can't help reading that as POOP MAX)
PPO expected medication costs: $600ish
PPO expected office visit costs: $700ish (hooray cheaper therapy!)
​
I guess I'm just confused at how to balance the triple tax advantage / investment potential of an HSA vs. paying $5000 extra out of pocket for a year vs. the 401k?
Edited to add more detailed numbers
AutoModerator t1_iuik19c wrote
Welcome to /r/personalfinance! Comments will be removed if they are political, medical advice, or unhelpful (subreddit rules). Our moderation team encourages respectful discussion.
You may find our Health Insurance wiki helpful.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.