Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

sequencedStimuli t1_j5zfl4y wrote

> I'm not anti immigrant just anti illegal immigration. Big difference.

I clearly laid out my position that both the current panic over high “illegal crossings”, and the general discord over undocumented people in the US during the previous decades, are purposefully manufactured political crises sustained by the same people who avoid improving the situation. It’s not a coincidence that as immigration expanded to include all racial groups, it suddenly became much harder to immigrate legally in the second half of the 20th century & after.

I think instead of this broken system, the US should be open to all immigrants in a manner closer to when my Irish and Italian ancestors immigrated legally with ease during the racist Exclusion Era.

> Over a million people crossed the border illegally last year is that ok?

With the context of what I said above, and given the other option is your authoritarian notion of a militarized border & strict enforcement without huge fixes to the system first, yes I am essentially okay with the crossings. Our nation has always had large inflows of immigrants. What has changed is our ineptitude at providing efficient means of legal immigration at scale. The dysfunction serves a cynical purpose.

−4

Grass8989 t1_j5zhj0w wrote

So we should go back to how immigration was 100+ years ago and provide 0 social services, housing, food, medical care, etc that we are allowing to the current migrants? You can’t compare immigration now to how it was back then.

2

sequencedStimuli t1_j5zivq7 wrote

Good thing I said "in a manner closer to" that era, which leaves ample room for the assumption that a modernized version of the more permissive system is implied, not a direct return to antiquated policy.

But that would be a good-faith assumption, so I understand why you didn't make it.

0