Submitted by greenhousecrtv t3_10ngrhz in nyc
Comments
WasherDrye t1_j68npf0 wrote
NYC promises telehealth for all high school students struggling with mental health
FTFY
tigermomo t1_j68plpl wrote
Kids that left school need this as well as students in school during time of covid
GoRangers5 t1_j68pw7p wrote
>Getting depressed kids off devices is half the solution, frankly.
100% this, Instagram and other social media is contributing to the spike in teen suicide rate, humans need face to face contact.
iRedditAlreadyyy t1_j68rebn wrote
As someone who does telehealth therapy, I 100% disagree. The benefit is there.
k1lk1 t1_j68s1fs wrote
The question is not "is there benefit", the question is "are we helping kids as much as we can, and getting value for our tax dollars" and the answer will be absolutely not.
Despite how young people think it's normal and natural for everything to be done online, it's really not, and that's why everyone's so mentally unwell these days. Doubling down by saying "hey, no need to get off your ass and go get help, simply facetime a therapist!" is unhelpful.
iRedditAlreadyyy t1_j68simz wrote
So then tell me, someone who has a weekly Zoom call with a therapist, what about it is unhelpful.
I have personal experience with this setup, you have a belief surrounding this setup. So prove me, a benefactor, wrong with what I said……..
What is in person care giving that online visitation isn’t.
azn_dude1 t1_j68td39 wrote
You need to back up your claims with sources, otherwise you're getting into "video games cause violence" territory
AnacharsisIV t1_j68tg67 wrote
Probably saves money on in-school guidance counselors and gives a kickback to whatever company is running the telehealth services.
AnacharsisIV t1_j68tnr4 wrote
The notion isn't that it's "unhelpful", but less helpful than seeing a therapist in-person. It's kind of like, we want the kids to eat food in school, and serving up a plate of fish sticks isn't unhelpful but it's not as good for them as a balanced salad or something.
lifestyle_deathstyle t1_j68uhga wrote
This is absurd. Telehealth therapy is real and balanced therapy, the benefits don’t go away or become diminished just because it’s done on a screen.
(Edited for clearer communication)
Pushed-pencil718 t1_j68whzu wrote
Agreed. Being in a person’s presence is totally different.
_busch t1_j68wkls wrote
we need free healthcare, at the point of service.
RChickenMan t1_j68xbro wrote
Honestly the teachers could use this as well.
iRedditAlreadyyy t1_j68xjt5 wrote
So I’ll ask again, what am I missing IN PERSON that I’m not getting over an internet call.
I’m asking you to back up your claims with examples.
Pool_Shark t1_j68xm3j wrote
We have this service that will help millions of kids but because a better version exists you would prefer the kids get nothing? Got it.
blackfire932 t1_j68xusp wrote
As someone who has had telehealth therapy and knows people who have, it can feel too distant and impersonal. It doesn’t work for everyone…
iRedditAlreadyyy t1_j68ydqc wrote
That’s more to do with the therapist than the method of communication. A good therapist doesn’t make someone feel distant or impersonal.
Sybertron t1_j68ymmh wrote
Now require it for every major healthplan.
blackfire932 t1_j68yvy4 wrote
Ahh so I only had bad therapists, not that the method of staring into a phone camera and watching a video of a person didn’t feel personal and connecting for me and some people I know…
Bradaigh t1_j68z5wc wrote
That's true for both in person and telehealth therapy though. The tele aspect creates another layer of distance to break through. It's really great that it works for you, but you can't extrapolate that to make blanket statements about its benefits.
ICantThinkOfANameBud t1_j68zf0g wrote
It depends completely on the person receiving the help. I do virtual mental health visits because I feel weird being in a room with a practical stranger speaking about why I want to kill myself, but virtual visits remove that issue for me.
FunkyDoktor t1_j68znnj wrote
Nothing like a Zoom call to shake off those pesky brain cobwebs!
iRedditAlreadyyy t1_j68zyys wrote
Then in that case you would benefit for in person support. But I’m confused why I’m getting replies pointing out disadvantages of something clearly beneficial
iRedditAlreadyyy t1_j6904jj wrote
Let’s be real. It’s such a beneficial thing that our tax money should pay for it for everyone.
tigermomo t1_j691dly wrote
ghrarhg t1_j6957jz wrote
Maybe just everyone really
my_metrocard t1_j69913j wrote
This would be really wonderful. Most child therapists in NYC don’t take insurance so there is a huge barrier to access. The majority of parents also don’t have the luxury of out of network benefits.
my_metrocard t1_j699d13 wrote
My kid has been seeing his therapist online since covid. He has still been tremendously helpful.
LunchMasterFlex t1_j69a71q wrote
Cutting school counselor budgets and giving kids a Better Help account is a bad idea.
HashtagDadWatts t1_j69aics wrote
Loads of online commenters believe that if something merely makes things better but not perfect, then it shouldn't be done. It's part of the lazy brand of contrarianism that's so popular these days.
brihamedit t1_j69cmyk wrote
Pure boomer think. Kids are fucked up now because their parents are fked up. They learn the wrong shit at home. Fkin therapy over zoom isn't going to make any difference. Well some will benefit from it sure. But there are major issues with bad upbringing and kids getting groomed for jail culture and stuff and zoom therapy or any therapy will not make any difference.
PatrickMaloney1 t1_j69fj2c wrote
NYC has successfully figured out how to push the buck on staffing adequate numbers of school psychologists AND providing an invaluable service at the same time. Honestly I’m impressed….
SirJoeffer t1_j69gqjd wrote
Therapy is invaluable to those who need it. And while I agree that you do get more out of it in in-person sessions that is just not a realistic option in this case. It has been incredibly hard for me to find an in-person therapist in the city and I have insurance, am able to make time for an appointment during a weekday, and am able to pay out of pocket costs. I doubt even half of students in the city have all that. This program is going to help people, full stop.
And there’s obviously a massive difference between using a device to go to therapy and using one to doomscroll on twitter/reddit or play video games. Its just the most boomer shit ever to hear this news and immediately go to ‘phone bad make kid big sad’
SirJoeffer t1_j69hcn0 wrote
Okay so you see no difference between a child using an ipad access social media and a child using an ipad to have a zoom call with a therapist where they can talk through their problems with a real person??
I see nothing to connect the adverse effects of social media on teens and increased telehealth access for teens besides you needing a phone for both. What’s next? We need to make appointments in person too because phone bad?
TheSkyIsFalling09 t1_j69lcg8 wrote
Tried telehealth and it just isn't for me. Seeing someone in person is a far more different and helpful experience
TheSkyIsFalling09 t1_j69lg0l wrote
School counselors don't really help with mental health
ripstep1 t1_j69lkod wrote
Yeah promise everyone free psychiatric telehealth visits. I’m sure that will go over well.
GoRangers5 t1_j69m4q9 wrote
>Okay so you see no difference between a child using an ipad access social media and a child using an ipad to have a zoom call with a therapist where they can talk through their problems with a real person??
How on earth did you draw that conclusion? The only point I was making was that an in-person session is better than a zoom session.
light_rapid t1_j69n8hh wrote
Another very subtle thing one may not consider, is that to complement your point of the virtual visit, you as a client are potentially in a much more comfortable space that you are familiar with. For some, the process of commuting to see a specialist can be stressful, in contrast to doing a video call where you can prepare yourself at your comfort level, environment(s), and conditions.
Obviously different strokes and preferences for different folks, though giving people options versus outright-nothing are steps in the right direction!
SirJoeffer t1_j69oaoy wrote
>Getting depressed kids off devices is half the solution, frankly.
>100% this, Instagram and other social media is contributing to the spike in teen suicide rate, humans need face to face contact.
It’s really giving ‘phone bad’
Maybe re read it
jdlyga t1_j69qp5z wrote
Probably going to be something like Headspace.
hosswanker t1_j69rhyh wrote
So you wanna get them new parents? Or try to give them tools to cope with the cards they were dealt? This is an absolute brain dead comment
Commercial_Mix_9808 t1_j69t9jh wrote
That’s capitalism for ya
brihamedit t1_j69uy4c wrote
> give them tools to cope
Boomer think. You are mistaking these attempts that appear like solutions to be more effective than they are. If some kid is fked up with deep rooted issues, as in learned all the wrong shit at home, then therapy will be rejected. Will be of no help.
laurasaurus5 t1_j69w4om wrote
I've had positive experiences with remote therapy! But I've also worked with young kids who would definitely have trouble with the format! Hopefully the remote model will prove successful enough to secure funding for more flexible options.
laurasaurus5 t1_j69x1vy wrote
On that note, students might not have their own room or private quiet space at home where they can feel safe discussing personal issues. I haven't read the article, but hopefully the schools can provide an area for this.
laurasaurus5 t1_j69x9xa wrote
(Obama voice) If you like your parents, you can keep them.
Nickyluvs2cum t1_j69zvqn wrote
Awww
Doomster78666 t1_j6a1iqu wrote
so lemme get this straight, they wanna help teenagers suffering from loneliness and social anxiety from covid/pandemic ... by giving them phone calls with therapists? that's so fucking stupid. the article says they wanna fix pandemic-borne social issues by using telehealth. that's literally a phonecall with a therapist holy shit they are dumb
[deleted] t1_j6a75bw wrote
[deleted]
funpen t1_j6aay02 wrote
Not good enough. They is the bare minimum of what can be done. Adams is a dope
hosswanker t1_j6acvnt wrote
So your alternative is what? The prison system? Just give up? Throw em in the trash? Eugenics?
Also the entire point of intensive therapy is to help out people who are fucked up with deep rooted issues. We should be putting more resources towards these issues, not less. Maybe consider some empathy
Edit: why on earth am I arguing on the internet again
movingtobay2019 t1_j6aejjm wrote
Is this like when the city promised free housing attorneys?
>City officials did not immediately provide details about how the program will work
Well I think that answers it.
TheShahofBra t1_j6ah2f6 wrote
You keep accusing others of "Boomer think", but everything you're saying is Boomer think.
maosaysmiao t1_j6amemf wrote
I have VA healthcare, but I pay out of pocket for mental health because the VA is grossly understaffed and inefficient. I hope NYC takes notes about how not to serve their patients.
AlarmingSorbet t1_j6amf3g wrote
I’d say it’s 50/50 from what I’ve experienced and heard. One of my kids loves telehealth, my other kid hates it. I’ve heard the same across the other parents who I see at the in person therapists office.
GiantPineapple t1_j6aosdu wrote
For real. My work puts me in contact with a lot of city agencies, and whenever I see something to the effect of "the City is going to send someone to help you," I think of someone's idiot cousin drawing a borderline no-show paycheck, trying to do an actual job where you aren't just Applying The Formula, and I can't imagine subjecting anyone to that, let alone someone who needs real help. Honest question, has anyone ever had a good experience with a city program that is just straight up supposed to help a needy person?
Refreshingpudding t1_j6arvhb wrote
If it can fix one in twenty it's probably worth it
randothrowawayaccnt t1_j6arvos wrote
>Edit: why on earth am I arguing on the internet
Lol, it happens to the best of us. I've attempted to avoid that, as much as possible.
RN, the question for me is, why have I been on Reddit for so many hours??
juniperaza t1_j6asvjb wrote
Really? I feel like therapists are more likely to take insurance. I think the real problem lies with psychiatrists. Very, very few of them take insurance and if they do, they’re fully booked for months out. And if you have shit insurance, you end up needing to go through public hospitals and their psychiatrists are also booked up.
deadheffer t1_j6auvp6 wrote
Gotta subsidize all of those folks with Psych degrees. Am I right? /s
movingtobay2019 t1_j6avurd wrote
Forget city programs that is supposed to help a needy person. Programs that are supposed to benefit everyone barely functions. DMV anyone?
burnbabyburnburrrn t1_j6axo6x wrote
Yeah been paying 350 a session (that’s the reduced rate) 6x a year to my psychiatrist for over a decade. It’s infuriating, but what I have to do to get my ADHD drugs. I wish it wasn’t so normalized for them to not accept insurance - you’re medical doctors! There aren’t like, spinal surgeons out there who only do out of pocket. My doc is great and deserves money, but I’m very poor and realizing I’ve paid him 21000 is upsetting.
my_metrocard t1_j6b4aag wrote
Therapists don’t take insurance because the contracted rates are so low. Even if the session is only 40-50 minutes, insurance companies make the therapists fight to continue treatment by requiring written treatment plans, denying authorization, making the therapists call them to appeal…a lot of uncompensated administrative time. I blame the insurance companies.
elkmeateater t1_j6b4y95 wrote
There aren't enough psychologists in the country to handle that.
jaimeyeah t1_j6b5wig wrote
Do they have good health insurance plans through DOE?
paruresis_guy t1_j6bcb4c wrote
Seriously reimbursement for behavioral health is an embarrassment.
txdline t1_j6bgbhy wrote
Even if they did, a lot of therapists don't take insurance.
[deleted] t1_j6bj6ut wrote
[deleted]
TheSpaceBetweenUs__ t1_j6bkw2z wrote
I bet it would. You could use it
aguafiestas t1_j6bsqu8 wrote
Sadly, there aren't enough psychiatrists.
[deleted] t1_j6bw3h9 wrote
ripstep1 t1_j6cx79u wrote
Already a 3 month wait for psychiatrists with 10% of the population having access. What do you think will happen when 100% of the population has free, unfettered access?
higmy6 t1_j6d5spp wrote
Yk, maybe the better way to attack this would be trying to get more psychiatrists, not prevent more people from getting care
ripstep1 t1_j6daa9s wrote
Generating a new psychiatrist takes about 9 years. Not to mention you cannot just snap your fingers and get a new psychiatrist. Only so many quality training positions available.
TheSpaceBetweenUs__ t1_j6ddurw wrote
You could try fixing that problem instead of thinking the solution is to block poor people from accessing healthcare.
Priorities is what this is really about. You think access to healthcare should be dependent on your ability to pay. Most of the rest of us don't. You are the problem
ripstep1 t1_j6dee3d wrote
What is your solution to that problem? Keep in mind that psychiatrists take 9 years to train and training positions are not unlimited.
higmy6 t1_j6dfs1v wrote
Yeah I know… so let’s start incentivizing a lot more it now so that we have an influx of them in 8-9 years.
We can also do things like promoting psychologists to receive extra training and even to encourage some to go all the way so we can bring some more in 4 years.
Then how about encouraging psychiatrists to come from other cities to bring some in immediately?
Of course these solutions have issues but we need to be doing something and simply neglecting to address the issue and pretend it’s solved by not allowing people to receive the care they need is only gonna make more problems for us, like it already is
TheSpaceBetweenUs__ t1_j6dfve6 wrote
More training positions, reduce the insane costs of education. Not difficult to figure this out on your own. Use that dense head of yours
But you and I both this isn’t a real concern you have. You just think poor people shouldn’t have healthcare. That’s called concern trolling
ITEACHSPECIALED t1_j6dk1b8 wrote
We receive it and so do students.
The organization is called HelloHero.
Only issue is that most of the providers are doing it part time.
My first few months with them, my provider cancelled every other week.
The provider I'm currently with is now consistent but they only offer thirty minutes sessions as opposed to 45 minute sessions or even hour long sessions like most therapists.
UpperLowerEastSide t1_j6dnl78 wrote
Psychiatrists are not the only health providers who can provide mental telehealth services.
ripstep1 t1_j6dscqx wrote
Therapists are in short supply as well. In high demand markets they are often going cash only.
Nurse practitioners are band aids that offer sub par services.
There really is not a quick solution to your problem
ripstep1 t1_j6dsjds wrote
You cannot just make new positions and generate high quality doctors. It’s simply a logical error on your part. The cost of education is an icing on the cake only. The US already fills every psychiatry position in the match each year despite high medical school costs.
ripstep1 t1_j6dss0p wrote
Encouraging psychiatrists to go to nyc is simply engaging in brain drain. You help your problem, and you fuck over Philadelphia.
Incentives won’t help the pipeline. Psychiatrists are already being generated at the max number of available residency slots.
UpperLowerEastSide t1_j6dtb4b wrote
Why is this my problem? Lack of access to Mental health services is an international problem. Something I would think a doctor would recognize.
ripstep1 t1_j6dtrzy wrote
Sure. And my point being that giving everyone free access is not the panacea that you think it is.
Not to mention if psychiatrists are pulling cash only practices, why would they accept whatever deal the government is going to offer them for public healthcare?
UpperLowerEastSide t1_j6duh6l wrote
Didn’t say it was a panacea. You seem to repeatedly be making assumptions about my POV.
TheSpaceBetweenUs__ t1_j6dxdyr wrote
“Logical error” lol shut the fuck up you think private insurance is the most efficient way to distribute healthcare despite overwhelming evidence that it is the sole reason we have the worst healthcare in the developed world.
You can make up any bullshit excuses to justify your prejudiced opinions that even you know are bullshit. You simply would rather have shitty expensive healthcare yourself than see a poor person in the same hospital as you. That’s what this is about, nothing more, and you know it. The only reason we don’t have universal healthcare is because of people like you who simply believe ‘inferior’ people shouldn’t have healthcare.
If anyone needs socialized medicine it’s you so you can get help for your antisocial selfish behavior
octodanger t1_j6e0f3q wrote
The data suggests that they are equivalent except for special circumstances (eg, eating disorder treatment). There are certainly individual preferences though.
UpperLowerEastSide t1_j6e3s7f wrote
Since you edited your comment but didn't reply to mine, I'll respond to your second part.
If you're genuinely wondering how you get psychiatrists to accept public healthcare, then it's improving wages and working conditions for psychiatrists who work at Health + Hospitals. Psychiatrists are already part of The City's "public healthcare" system through Health + Hospitals. And in the shorter term, it's expanding the number of openings for psychiatrists and therapists.
In any case, having nothing but criticisms helps discuss the issues with a plan, what helps even more, especially if you are a physician is providing your own solutions to the issue.
ripstep1 t1_j6e6ei4 wrote
I never made any such claim. Universal healthcare is the only good solution
TheSpaceBetweenUs__ t1_j6e8hrv wrote
Do you not realize those are two contradictory things?
ripstep1 t1_j6e8wh6 wrote
What two things? What did I say that preempts a universal healthcare option?
TheSpaceBetweenUs__ t1_j6f4xie wrote
No you think therapists and psychiatrists shouldn’t be included for some reason, which would in turn be going against universal healthcare
sternfan1523 t1_j6f9jso wrote
People on here think staying home forever is a normal thing so can’t relate
uona1 t1_j6gf8ng wrote
I'm probably going to say something politically incorrect here but sometimes I feel we classify too many things as mental health issues and then use that as an excuse as to why we fail. I feel like if we pulled this shit in china Japan or Korea you would just be laughed out of a job. Not that there's never any mental health issues it just seems like everything including laziness is a mental health issue nowadays.
Like even in the us some of the things we call a mental health issue now would just get you a butt whooping from your dad a generation ago.
ripstep1 t1_j6hu85f wrote
My same statement applies to every physician. There are month long waits for tons of different specialists. Radiology facilities are already pushed to the brink. What’s going to happen when the flood gates open?
There is nuance to this that the layman hasnt attempted to understand
IncomingBlessings t1_j6ih2qf wrote
Headway is a great place to find therapists who take insurance. They’re currently expanding to different states and adding on insurance plans but they do take the big ones atm such as Aetna, UHC, and BcBs
txdline t1_j6iigyc wrote
Appreciate the tip! I'm sure many here do
grandzu t1_j6liz5d wrote
NYC loves promising stuff.
k1lk1 t1_j68lcu5 wrote
Telehealth is a boutique novelty, the benefits to seeing someone in person are important. Getting depressed kids off devices is half the solution, frankly.