Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Myske1 t1_j20lysa wrote

Or maybe it should put the brakes on development. We're the densest most-crowded city in the country -- let people move somewhere else if they can't find a place to stay here. Once some other cities get up to size, then maybe we can grow more.

1

brianvan t1_j20mgb2 wrote

Yes, let 800,000 people move out so we can equalize demand with supply. Feel free to lead the way!

Oh, that’s not what you meant… who are you thinking should be the ones to move out?

6

Myske1 t1_j20pbp9 wrote

I can afford where I live. If people can't afford it, they should move to where they can afford to live. It's not rocket science.

0

brianvan t1_j20puhk wrote

They can’t afford moving and changing jobs. You can. It’s not rocket science 🚀 🚀 🚀

5

Myske1 t1_j20q53h wrote

There are plenty of places willing to move people to do low skill jobs. The oil and gas industry in the Dakotas for example. Higher skill workers shouldn't have any problem either. The only excuse for not leaving is not wanting to.

1

beepoppab t1_j22i8tz wrote

Classic "fuck you, I got mine" mentality.

You're a funny little troll. Keep it up!

3

kapuasuite t1_j23pbru wrote

Sounds like a dumb idea, thanks for sharing!

0

Myske1 t1_j23pihf wrote

👆 this comment brought to you by a real estate industry shill who wants to build baby build so his boss can can even richer at the expense of local neighborhoods.

−1

kapuasuite t1_j23wpl2 wrote

Building new homes, businesses, and infrastructure to accommodate more people is a good thing. If having to look at new people and new things upsets you, that’s entirely on you.

0

Myske1 t1_j23yr56 wrote

You're projecting a lot onto me. Not surprising for a real estate shill.

0