gamelord12 t1_ix91b8y wrote
Reply to comment by darkknight915 in Street safety advocate hit by car while biking to NYC memorial for crash victims by Miser
Oh, is this the first time you've ever heard of induced demand? Give it a Google. We've got so much data proving that taking lanes away from cars in favor of things with higher throughput like bus only lanes and bike lanes actually does wonders for reducing traffic. And definitively, the thing that does not fix traffic is adding more lanes for cars.
drpvn t1_ix987yd wrote
We should remove some bike lanes—it will reduce bike traffic!
gamelord12 t1_ix9a1jr wrote
The threshold for how many bikes would have to be on one street to cause what could be considered "traffic" is so much higher than cars that I doubt you've ever seen it in this city. And that, once again, is because bike lanes provide higher throughput.
But at this point, you're just trying to avoid admitting that you were wrong. It's cool; induced demand is a somewhat unintuitive concept at first, but we know it for a fact, and it's why there are advocacy groups for bike lanes, which are for multiple forms of micromobility, by the way; not only bikes.
drpvn t1_ix9a6t9 wrote
I’m just tossing in a gratuitous joke about the reflexive invocation of induced demand.
gamelord12 t1_ix9agbh wrote
Demonstrating your complete lack of understanding, yes.
drpvn t1_ix9aje3 wrote
Don’t get mad!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments