Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Rottimer t1_iy2iulr wrote

Because it can be both. It's clearly a hard fucking job. That doesn't mean you dismiss claims of bias from the agencies own fucking employees.

I have a friend that's a single parent in a very high paying, demanding job. She makes a lot of money. She lives in a very high end apartment. One night her kid touched a hot pan while she was cooking. She rushed him to the ER - no serious injury though she felt horrible. The doctors told her they had to report the incident to CPS. She understood.

CPS shows up later that night, looks around in awe of the apartment and leaves within a couple of minutes. Now I know my friend isn't abusing her child. But that seemed to be a pretty cursory investigation for CPS to determine that. IF instead she was a single mother in a housing project, with plumbing that had not been fixed by the city and a lack of children's books - do you think that would have gone the same way?

In the end CPS needs to be judged on their consistency and transparency. They could absolutely be negligent in one instance, and biased in another. Those things aren't mutually exclusive.

0

NetQuarterLatte t1_iy4f7x5 wrote

>In the end CPS needs to be judged on their consistency and transparency.

Bingo.

CPS shouldn't be going around applying one standard for rich kids and another standard for poor kids. Or one standard for White kids and another Black kids. Or one standard for kids living in luxury apartments vs. kids living in poorer housing.

They should just be doing their job and assessing whether those kids are in a safe environment.

In the case at hand: it sounded kind of obvious those kids were living in a house with a dry powder keg.

5

PandaJ108 t1_iy6ttdk wrote

Only thing consistent about CPS is there under funding and large caseloads. 67% of their caseload is following up on unfounded cases the result of mandatory reporting. I would imagine quite a bit of those unfounded cases consist of situations like you describe involving your friend.

Imagine if they went the full throttle in regards to your friends and allocated multiple visits and resources to that case. That would have been another case not being investigated.

1