Comments
chumboschrute t1_ivkzed4 wrote
And this is why nothing will ever change in this city. No competition = atrophy
brownredgreen t1_ivkzjep wrote
Another reason to switch from FPTP to Representational Apportionment.
We already have the majority of people voting for parties and not, actually, people.
TheTeenageOldman t1_ivl0qyr wrote
"Our leaders are the finest men, and we elect them again and again..."
Myske1 t1_ivl3kbr wrote
All the judges here where I live in Brooklyn were unopposed, and there's no primary for them. They either ran just as Dems or as both Dems and Reps. They were all pretty clearly chosen by the party machine.
It's fucking absurd. Either there should be primaries for them, or the mayor should appoint them with the consent of the city council. Judges should not be appointed by unelected party bosses.
MLao_ t1_ivl3q9i wrote
Anyone decent is squashed and marginalized by the party they run with, and nobody is voting for a 3rd party candidate.
RedOrca-15483 t1_ivl3vge wrote
While the headline is depressing at first glance, it makes sense some of the candidates on this list go unchallenged. But yeah, no competition is a problem.
[deleted] t1_ivl4wg9 wrote
[deleted]
Myske1 t1_ivl5g57 wrote
Run how? The two parties submit their lists. Lists that they pick behind the scenes. Lists that are somehow identical to each other because the Dem and Rep party bosses have clearly made a deal.
[deleted] t1_ivl5obt wrote
[deleted]
panda12291 t1_ivl897l wrote
The issue is the way that judges are selected in NY. The party holds a "judicial nominating convention" at which it selects the candidates that will be on the ballot, and then they all run unopposed. There is no primary to win; there is no transparency in the party selection process. The solution you propose simply doesn't exist. This is a real problem with judicial elections in NY that does not have an easy solution.
64321684 t1_ivl8bt8 wrote
Yep, this is right. I know one of the judges on the ballot. It took them years to win the right to be the sole candidate on the ballot. Years of attending stupid events all across the city and kissing the rings of those who actually make this decision. The whole system is absolutely fucking absurd.
Myske1 t1_ivl9nkz wrote
There’s no primary. Did you not read the comment you replied to?
ripstep1 t1_ivla3fg wrote
Can you just declare you are in the Democratic Party though?
froggythefish t1_ivldlpy wrote
Seeger-pilled
The-_Captain t1_ivle5kq wrote
I write names like Mike Hunt as write ins on every race that’s not opposed out of principle. The majority of races on my ballot were unopposed, or had the same candidate run in two parties.
NathalieHJane t1_ivlfbcs wrote
This is why it's pointless to be registered as anything except a Democrat in this city if you have any desire to vote in an election that has meaning, i.e. the Democratic primary.
ForeignWin9265 t1_ivlhhkj wrote
Something is clearly wrong
Samcrow15 t1_ivlj0cb wrote
I thought i was tripping when i read the ballot
HendrixChord12 t1_ivlj21z wrote
Yea I thought that was strange. Is it not possible for a single independent to get on the ballot?
chumboschrute t1_ivllcms wrote
From the top down
LouisSeize t1_ivllj7m wrote
I refuse to be registered in any party and I refuse to vote for judges that I as an attorney know are incompetent.
NetQuarterLatte t1_ivln802 wrote
I’m writing in a protest vote in all unopposed ballots.
FlargMaster t1_ivlnhto wrote
Completely fucked. I couldn't believe my ballot.
sirzoop t1_ivlnw79 wrote
It is they just won't win
ChapCat23 t1_ivloc5o wrote
> Either there should be primaries for them, or the mayor should appoint them with the consent of the city council. Judges should not be appointed by unelected party bosses.
I always write my name in for these bc its pull and not an election. writing my name 17 times was fun.
NetQuarterLatte t1_ivlovnr wrote
I write in names like “More Candidates” if i don’t know who is in that ballot.
If I know the candidate is terrible, I vote for “Golden Retriever” or “Mickey Mouse”
Isawthebeets t1_ivlprty wrote
Beaver Falls PD would be proud.
elizabeth-cooper t1_ivlq7on wrote
Such as who?
LouisSeize t1_ivlqmfu wrote
Thanks, but no thanks. Some judges are very petty and have been known to take revenge against lawyers for much slighter things.
Today, I saw one name on the ballot for Justice of the Supreme Court of a judge who personally told me he or she does not care what the higher courts have ruled.
Pastatively t1_ivlrzyz wrote
I wrote “this is a joke” across that section of the ballot.
brickmaj t1_ivls246 wrote
And I didn’t do it this year, but last year I tried to loo up info on these candidate judges and there was like zero info on them at all. Like a sentence on ballotpedia. And these are the fucks who game me 15 car registration violations when I had a temp reg printed out on my dash.
elizabeth-cooper t1_ivls4qy wrote
>does not care what the higher courts have ruled.
Kind of depends what they mean by this. Anyway, if they don't rule correctly, doesn't that just give the losing party ammo to put in their appeal?
ChapCat23 t1_ivlsxw4 wrote
haha I have in the past voted for different Pokémon instead of the actual candidates.
spad807 t1_ivlxv55 wrote
I asked the poll site workers if I misunderstood the ballot - they laughed and said nope all are running unopposed.
LouisSeize t1_ivlyieu wrote
What they mean when they say, "I don't care what the Court of Appeals said?"
>Anyway, if they don't rule correctly, doesn't that just give the losing party ammo to put in their appeal?
Do you think judges should deliberately ignore the law and force litigants into the cost and time of an appeal?
libananahammock t1_ivm016o wrote
It works the same way out on Long Island when it comes to dems and republicans making deals on who to run. It’s shady all around.
B-BoyStance t1_ivm096r wrote
It's a club and we ain't in it
libananahammock t1_ivm0b2w wrote
Rottimer t1_ivm0nfr wrote
They should be appointed by the governor and approved by the legislature. Right now the process has no transparency, and thats a problem.
Smoy t1_ivm2l7w wrote
Oh yeah let me just put this spare million dollars I have into my election fund. Good thing I can spend my time campaigning instead of like, working my job that puts food on the table. Who needs that
shotpun t1_ivm50wb wrote
problem is we (as a society) have decided that the people whose entire lifes work should be dedicated to removing bias from the legal system also have to run partisan political campaigns
evilgenius12358 t1_ivmh3vb wrote
The sure as shit vote for it.
mowotlarx t1_ivmhq80 wrote
We shouldn't be electing judges anyway. Us trying to get judges to declare their political party and run on that ticket is sick.
Few-Artichoke-2531 t1_ivmuayb wrote
I voted but refused to vote for uncontested candidates.
Few-Artichoke-2531 t1_ivmuqnb wrote
You can also just leave it blank as a no vote/protest vote.
joyousRock t1_ivmwxph wrote
Free_Joty t1_ivmxzsy wrote
These past few years have convinced me that primaries are bad
We get wackos from both sides winning the low turnout primaries, and we’re stuck with shithole candidates on both sides
Look at PA senator race - a disabled man ( feel bad for him but he has no business being a senator right now, there has to be some one else in Pa better equipped for the job) vs some tv asshole
We’re stuck with SHIT. We wouldn’t have trump and Magas if established republicans just picked their presidential candidate. We wouldn’t have MTG or Herschel Walker. These fucking extreme shitholes who are engaged with politics more than the average Joe are electing grade a shit candidates.
Soon our races will be a literal fascist vs a literal communist.
valoremz t1_ivn13xq wrote
> kissing the rings of those who actually make this decision.
Can you elaborate or give an example of who these party bosses are?
odeebee t1_ivn84sz wrote
Go to law school. Become a lawyer. Then become a judge. Then claim all elections are fraud and that all criminal prosecutions are witch-hunts. Then run as a Republican in NYC. This will all be a totally good use of your time, talent, and money I promise.
Tan-Hat-Man-CPW t1_ivo8lyr wrote
Under the law, yes. But many litigants will never appeal due to either or both of the cost or/and frustration of continuing in the lawsuit.
It is also bizarre for a lawyer to prepare a case within the parameters of the law when the judge does not respect or adhere to the same parameters.
BlueShield t1_ivooo4g wrote
Running unopposed is not a problem... The "solution" would be to introduce Republican candidates which is completely unnecessary and would just make things worse.
DARKZIDE4EVER t1_ivq4f2p wrote
2 ways to fix this, republican party has to get candidates in every race or active chain of command.
With chain of command, if you ran unopposed last race, you have to run against the person that is under you for your seat 👀
ER301 t1_ivkx347 wrote
Yea, this is a problem.