Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

AutoModerator t1_iut3g5n wrote

Users often report submissions from this site and ask us to ban it for sensationalized articles. At /r/nyc, we oppose blanket banning any news source. Readers have a >responsibility to be skeptical, check sources and comment on any flaws. You can help improve this thread by linking to media that verifies or questions this article's claims. Your link could help readers better understand this issue. If you do find >evidence that this article or its title are false or misleading, contact the moderators who will review it.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

Pool_Shark t1_iut7109 wrote

That’s good news, but there’s something afoot here. Hopefully the plan will shift to building housing since this would be the most logical place to increase housing in NYC with all the transportation and even walking distance to offices.

Either way you never see a mega real estate developer pull out of a project like this for fun so there’s more to this story.

7

myassholealt t1_iutbyrr wrote

Dude smells a recession on the horizon and doesn't want to get bogged down on new developments is my uneducated guess.

38

Burymeincalamine t1_iutc23c wrote

Housing can’t go up everywhere. There are zoning regulations, etc.

New office buildings are not the worst thing in the world either and Class A is certainly not ‘sitting empty’ — look at Hudson Yards. It’s the older buildings that are tenantless, but there’s an opportunity there to convert or raze those into residential like they did in Fidi.

Anyway, they are pulling out using soft wording because it’s not as clear 100% anymore if Hochul is going to stay put. It is pretty obvious.

2

Status_Fox_1474 t1_iutcuzn wrote

Honestly, this may be the worst place to have housing. It's where so many commuters and travelers are coming into. Building for commercial here is great for Jersey residents who work in Manhattan, as well as out-of-town travelers coming in for meetings.

34

Burymeincalamine t1_iutdfnu wrote

It doesn’t take a billionaire multiple rate increases to “smell a recession”, and real estate developers who are flush with cash do not pause bottoms up new builds that take many, many years for cyclical events. Either they have run out of cash flow or this is election-driven

21

thebruns t1_iutdri9 wrote

Uh, arent they in the process of currently knocking down two massive buildings, including the hotel? They plan on leaving giant holes?

.....oh, I guess they could leave the giant holes there until they get enough "incentives" to fill them with something

16

ChrisFromLongIsland t1_iutigf8 wrote

Hochul should just eminent domain the lots and use it to build more tracks and a tunnel to NJ. It's easier if the existing buildings are torn down. Then when things are right the city can give 100 year leases out to developers.

Hochul should play hard ball.

0

Jimmy_kong253 t1_iutude0 wrote

It's going to be built regardless of who wins in November the developers have both parties in their pockets

1

TwoCats_OneMan t1_iuu8ee5 wrote

That's ok, Lee Zeldin is taking over in January.

−5

gaiusahala t1_iuutuy0 wrote

I believe the Hotel Penn site is separate from the rest of the Penn developments as it is not on the Penn Station footprint so doesn’t involve NYS cooperation. It could similarly be affected by the current economic situation but probably isn’t what they were referring to.

7

FarFromSane_ t1_iuva9v5 wrote

I have a roommate who works in that area. We live on Roosevelt Island. I could understand the commute if we lived closer to Penn Station (or Hoboken Terminal), but from all the way here it seems like a lot.

2

HourlyEdo t1_iuvjl06 wrote

Sounds like they're not a fan

1

Brooklyn-Epoxy t1_iux5ueh wrote

Can we just knock down and relocate MSg and rebuild the old Penn with improvements?

0

Burymeincalamine t1_iux73ry wrote

The types of tenants that occupy these buildings (banks, law firms, consulting firms, tech) are back in the office for front office teams - banks 5 days a week, and the others 3+ days a week. Just because average companies have gone remote doesn’t mean that anchor trophy tenants have also.

2

well-that-was-fast t1_iuxsapj wrote

>>>But Evercore ISI analyst Steve Sakwa told Crain’s that Roth’s statement means the project is “certainly delayed” due to lack of office demand. “They won’t spend billions to build an empty building,” he said.

Presumably this means they don't think Class A occupancy will be back to normal for 3+ years.

3

cbnyc0 t1_iuxt8ab wrote

Yes, it does.

It was built directly over the Amtrak and LIRR lines that lead into Penn Station from the East. Its foundations straddle the tunnel. So, I’m guessing upgrades to that tunnel are much easier to accomplish with its removal.

3

cbnyc0 t1_iuxtqes wrote

They’re a commercial real estate developer and state money for the project is from a completely different part of the state budget. That area is also a major commercial zoning block, very little (legal) residential space over there. Slowing the Penn area development will not correlate with new housing in any way.

4

Burymeincalamine t1_iuxtvkl wrote

Maybe. Or every big firm has recently signed a long lease over at Hudson yards or another new shiny building (one Vanderbilt, etc) recently — all of which are like 100% lessed — and maybe they haven’t seen much interest in their upcoming penn hotel replacement

5

cbnyc0 t1_iuxuqek wrote

If we get a Republican governor we are kinda screwed. The economy is already trashed and their policies would make it so much worse.

She’s not the best, but I’d rather have her in office than the racist robber barons.

She did okay taking over for Dickish Rich, er, Chris— I mean, Luigi— I mean Super Mario Cuomo— I mean, Andrew Cuomo.

3

pixel_of_moral_decay t1_iv32kgv wrote

It also buys time for more tax breaks.

He’s not going to be able to lease the space, which means money is tied up in that project and high interest rates.

Much better to leave money in the bank, spend the time insisting he needs tax breaks to help “create jobs” then try to time construction with the emergence out of a recession.

He’ll get $100M+ out of this move.

1