Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Guypussy t1_itvs8jr wrote

>[StreetEasy] used search data to determine which places in three boroughs — Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Queens — are the most popular so far this year. Notably, the Bronx and Staten Island were excluded from the report.

Oof.

53

sassbayc t1_itvuiq3 wrote

Even if you got a decent rent deal between how overpriced food is, going out, Uber, etc you aren’t leaving your house without spending at least $100 if you do anything.

5

doctor_van_n0strand t1_itwi69z wrote

>1 .Long Island City
>
>2. Astoria
>
>3. Sunnyside
>
>4. Forest Hills
>
>5. Ridgewood
>
>The most searched neighborhoods in Queens are some of the most affordable.
>
>Besides Long Island City, the other neighborhood on StreetEasy’s most-searched list for the last five years is Astoria. The median asking rent was $2,650, and the median asking price was $798,913.

I knew it. It's over for Astoria. Get ready for New Park Slope.

37

Darrkman t1_itwp1el wrote

I don't know if I would call Forest Hills or Sunnyside or even Astoria affordable.

12

kolt54321 t1_itwy78u wrote

Much of Forest Hills doesn't even have train access if I remember correctly. It's a bus to the train, and a bad one at that.

Edit: I was thinking of Kew Garden Hills one neighborhood over, my mistake.

1

Queenv918 t1_itx8zhi wrote

E & F trains both run express from Lexington Ave to 71st-Continental in Forest Hills, then continue all the way to Jamaica. The M & R local trains are the ones that dont go beyond Forest Hills

7

[deleted] t1_itxh3tt wrote

Thank God my neighborhood isn't listed.

6

PostPostMinimalist t1_itxigzm wrote

It'll probably get more expensive but I don't think it'll ever be "new Park Slope". I mean, the architecture is so different, it'll always have one subway line, and it won't have the huge park next to it. It has pluses, just different.

15

myassholealt t1_itxj4ye wrote

>The most searched neighborhoods in Queens are some of the most affordable.

Id like to know what the writer's bar for affordable crossing over into unaffordable is. Cause numbers 1, 2 and 4 are not affordable for a solo person looking for a 1B who doesn't make six figures or more.

10

Ghost_of_Hicks t1_ity4sjn wrote

You know what? For 150k (give or take) you can buy in the Bronx in places that are livable.

Pros:

multiple train lines

cheap, fresh produce and meat

45 minutes to mid-town

No hipsters

Cons:

Noisy abuelitas playing bingo... They get ornery (fly) like a G6...

Amateur stunt cyclists (they never meat crayon, disappointingly)

That one murder of crows that knows my face.

The weird neighbor with the startling sneeze.

16

valoremz t1_itz8u3i wrote

How has Forest Hills changed over the past 10-20 years? When I lived in Queens, Forest Hills was a predominantly middle class, upper middle class, and even wealthy (Forest Hills Gardens). A lot of blue collar jobs and also working class families and also Western European families. Has it changed at all? Do wealth folks who want to stay in NYC still live in the Gardens?

2

porkedpie1 t1_itzb2ra wrote

Lol. Maybe just maybe they are the most searched for because they are cheaper. Otherwise it’d be all East/West Village

2

PoopEmoji8618 t1_itzti35 wrote

Is this referring to LIC? Because that’s very wrong if it is. 7/E/G/M are within 10 mins. Huge park is gantry. Is it the size of prospect? No, but you’re also comparing two different things - inland park and waterfront park. Both of which have their pros and cons

0

guccigenshin t1_iu5l48n wrote

I feel like it's more or less the same, but probably leaning wealthier simply bc more people know about it now, especially ever since the opening of the stadium has gotten out-of-towners to visit regularly. I remember walking on austin st on a concert night and overhearing a bunch of rando's saying things like, "wow this place is so cute should i move here??"

2