Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

UnusualAd6529 t1_jd179dj wrote

It's not really feasible as the canals existed a LONG time ago, namely during the time of Dutch settlement in New Amsterdam.

The ditch are expert canal builders and brought a lot of what they learned from developing their cities to the island of Manhattan.

However, while the Dutch were great canal builders, the English were great land builders. As in London, English settlers and their subsequent anglo-Nee Yorker descendants filled in acres and acres of the river and wetlands systems such that the edge the water where canals used to start are far from the rivers.

That being said Canals don't really make sense for New York. 200 years of development and infilling mean every square inch if Manhattan is densely developed high density urban landscape. It wouldn't be feasible nor beneficial to rip a canal into the city. No canal transportation could possibly compete with the high efficiency of rail in that kind of setting.

19

Metapod_Used_Hardon t1_jd183u3 wrote

> The ditch are expert canal builders

They’d have to be, with a name like “the ditch.”

12

Life_Equivalent_2104 OP t1_jd17lrk wrote

This so far is the best answer I've gotten and thoroughly explains

7

Sad-Principle3781 t1_jd2gjn1 wrote

i mean duh. canals won't make any sense compared to trains for transportation. they're more fun now but not practical

3